Unsteady flow features across different shock/boundary-layer interaction configurations
File(s)2019-08-J058918-R1_Threadgill-Bruce.pdf (8.92 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Threadgill, James
Bruce, Paul
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
An experimental study has been conducted to investigate unsteady flow phenomena observed within various two-dimensional configurations of shock/boundary layer interactions.
Six configurations have been tested in Mach 2 flow: ϕ1 = 14◦ and 20◦
compression ramps,
and incident shock reflections from ϕ1 = 7◦
, 8
◦
, 9
◦
, and 10◦
shock generators; Reynolds
numbers in each case are Reθ ≈ 8350. The flow is assessed using an array of fast-response
pressure transducers in conjunction with a high-repetition rate PIV system. Development
of the mean flow structures early in each interaction is observed to be consistent with
the Free Interaction concept. Unsteady wall-pressure energy content at frequencies above
those associated with the characteristic low-frequency shock motion also show significant
similarities in the vicinity of the shock foot. Results confirm that this low-frequency peak
is not associated with a narrow-band forcing mechanism from either upstream or downstream, but rather a characteristic frequency that varies with interaction strength, which
describes the flow’s dynamic response. These findings support various models published in
literature that have sought to explain the source of low-frequency unsteady shock motion.
Six configurations have been tested in Mach 2 flow: ϕ1 = 14◦ and 20◦
compression ramps,
and incident shock reflections from ϕ1 = 7◦
, 8
◦
, 9
◦
, and 10◦
shock generators; Reynolds
numbers in each case are Reθ ≈ 8350. The flow is assessed using an array of fast-response
pressure transducers in conjunction with a high-repetition rate PIV system. Development
of the mean flow structures early in each interaction is observed to be consistent with
the Free Interaction concept. Unsteady wall-pressure energy content at frequencies above
those associated with the characteristic low-frequency shock motion also show significant
similarities in the vicinity of the shock foot. Results confirm that this low-frequency peak
is not associated with a narrow-band forcing mechanism from either upstream or downstream, but rather a characteristic frequency that varies with interaction strength, which
describes the flow’s dynamic response. These findings support various models published in
literature that have sought to explain the source of low-frequency unsteady shock motion.
Date Issued
2020-06-07
Date Acceptance
2020-02-29
Citation
AIAA Journal: devoted to aerospace research and development, 2020, 58 (7), pp.1-13
ISSN
0001-1452
Publisher
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Start Page
1
End Page
13
Journal / Book Title
AIAA Journal: devoted to aerospace research and development
Volume
58
Issue
7
Copyright Statement
© 2020 by James Threadgill. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.
Identifier
https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.J058918
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Engineering, Aerospace
Engineering
LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS
SHOCK-INDUCED SEPARATION
WAVE STRUCTURE
PRESSURE
MOTION
FLUCTUATIONS
ORGANIZATION
OSCILLATION
SIMULATION
MODEL
0901 Aerospace Engineering
0905 Civil Engineering
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Aerospace & Aeronautics
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2020-06-07