Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
File(s)Fats_ovca_EPIC_manuscript_Can_Epi_R1_clean_copy.docx (191.99 KB) Fats_ovca_EPIC_Supplementary_Table_R1_S1.doc (52 KB)
Accepted version
Supporting information
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
There are inconsistent and limited data available to assess the relationship between fat intake and risk of
epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We examined the consumption of total fat, fat sources and fat subtypes in
relation to risk of EOC and its major histologic subtypes in the European Prospective Investigation into
Cancer and Nutrition which includes incident invasive (n = 1095) and borderline (n = 96) EOC. Cox
proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals
(CIs). In multivariate models, we observed no association with consumption of total fat, animal or plant
fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, monounsaturated fat, or fatty fish and risk of invasive EOC. There was,
however, an increased risk of invasive EOC in the highest category of intake (Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1) of
polyunsaturated fat (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02–1.48, Ptrend = 0.02). We did not observe heterogeneity in the
risk associations in comparisons of serous and endometrioid histologic subtypes. This study does not
support an etiological role for total fat intake in relation to EOC risk; however, based on observations of a
positive association between intake of polyunsaturated fat and invasive EOC risk in the current and
previous studies, this fat subtype warrants further investigation to determine its potential role in EOC
development.
epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We examined the consumption of total fat, fat sources and fat subtypes in
relation to risk of EOC and its major histologic subtypes in the European Prospective Investigation into
Cancer and Nutrition which includes incident invasive (n = 1095) and borderline (n = 96) EOC. Cox
proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals
(CIs). In multivariate models, we observed no association with consumption of total fat, animal or plant
fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, monounsaturated fat, or fatty fish and risk of invasive EOC. There was,
however, an increased risk of invasive EOC in the highest category of intake (Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1) of
polyunsaturated fat (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02–1.48, Ptrend = 0.02). We did not observe heterogeneity in the
risk associations in comparisons of serous and endometrioid histologic subtypes. This study does not
support an etiological role for total fat intake in relation to EOC risk; however, based on observations of a
positive association between intake of polyunsaturated fat and invasive EOC risk in the current and
previous studies, this fat subtype warrants further investigation to determine its potential role in EOC
development.
Date Issued
2014-08-22
Date Acceptance
2014-07-29
Citation
Cancer Epidemiology, 2014, 38 (5), pp.528-537
ISSN
1877-7821
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
528
End Page
537
Journal / Book Title
Cancer Epidemiology
Volume
38
Issue
5
Copyright Statement
© 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Ovarian cancer
Dietary fats
Unsaturated dietary fats
Serous neoplasms
FOOD-FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE
RELATIVE VALIDITY
NUTRIENT INTAKE
BREAST-CANCER
REPRODUCIBILITY
COHORT
METAANALYSIS
DISEASE
HEALTH
WOMEN
Publication Status
Published