Co-benefits from sustainable dietary shifts for population and environmental health: an assessment from a large European cohort study
File(s)1-s2.0-S2542519621002503-main.pdf (799.54 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Unhealthy diets, the rise of non-communicable diseases, and the declining health of the planet are highly intertwined, where food production and consumption are major drivers of increases in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, substantial land use, (LU) and adverse health outcomes such as cancer and mortality.
Methods: In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), a multi-centre prospective cohort study (n=443,991), we estimated associations between dietary contributions to GHG emissions and LU and all-cause and cause-specific mortality and incident cancers using Cox proportional-hazard regression models. Co-benefits, encompassing the potential effects of alternative diets on all-cause mortality and cancer and potential reduction in GHG emissions and LU, were estimated using counterfactual attributable fraction (AF) intervention models, simulating potential effects from dietary shifts based on the EAT-Lancet reference diet.
Findings: There was an association between levels of dietary-based GHG emissions and LU and all-cause mortality, with a Hazard Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 1.13 (1.10, 1.16) and 1.18 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.21), respectively, comparing the fourth quartile to the first (HRQ4 vs Q1). Similar associations were observed for cause-specific mortality. There were also associations between overall cancer rates and GHG emissions (HRQ4 vs Q1: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.14) and LU (HRQ4 vs Q1: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.15); however, estimates differed by cancer type. Through counterfactual AF modelling of shifts in diets, we find that between 19 to 63% of deaths and 10 to 39% of cancers could be prevented, over a 20-year risk period, from adhering to different scores of the EAT-Lancet reference diet. Additionally, switching from a lower score of the EAT-Lancet reference diet to a higher score could reduce food-associated GHG and LU levels by 50% and 62%, respectively.
Interpretation: Our results support shifts in diets that could lead to co-benefits, minimizing dietary related GHG emissions and LU, to reduce environmental footprints, aiding in climate change mitigation, and improving population health.
Methods: In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), a multi-centre prospective cohort study (n=443,991), we estimated associations between dietary contributions to GHG emissions and LU and all-cause and cause-specific mortality and incident cancers using Cox proportional-hazard regression models. Co-benefits, encompassing the potential effects of alternative diets on all-cause mortality and cancer and potential reduction in GHG emissions and LU, were estimated using counterfactual attributable fraction (AF) intervention models, simulating potential effects from dietary shifts based on the EAT-Lancet reference diet.
Findings: There was an association between levels of dietary-based GHG emissions and LU and all-cause mortality, with a Hazard Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 1.13 (1.10, 1.16) and 1.18 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.21), respectively, comparing the fourth quartile to the first (HRQ4 vs Q1). Similar associations were observed for cause-specific mortality. There were also associations between overall cancer rates and GHG emissions (HRQ4 vs Q1: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.14) and LU (HRQ4 vs Q1: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.15); however, estimates differed by cancer type. Through counterfactual AF modelling of shifts in diets, we find that between 19 to 63% of deaths and 10 to 39% of cancers could be prevented, over a 20-year risk period, from adhering to different scores of the EAT-Lancet reference diet. Additionally, switching from a lower score of the EAT-Lancet reference diet to a higher score could reduce food-associated GHG and LU levels by 50% and 62%, respectively.
Interpretation: Our results support shifts in diets that could lead to co-benefits, minimizing dietary related GHG emissions and LU, to reduce environmental footprints, aiding in climate change mitigation, and improving population health.
Date Issued
2021-11
Date Acceptance
2021-08-20
Citation
The Lancet Planetary Health, 2021, 5 (11), pp.e786-e796
ISSN
2542-5196
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
e786
End Page
e796
Journal / Book Title
The Lancet Planetary Health
Volume
5
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© 2021 International Agency for Research on Cancer; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article
published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that
IARC endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the IARC logo is not permitted. This notice
should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that
IARC endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the IARC logo is not permitted. This notice
should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
License URL
Sponsor
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519621002503?via%3Dihub
Grant Number
MR/M501669/1
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-10-22