Comment on “Self-diffusion in high-purity α-Al2O3: Comparison of Ti-doped, Mg-doped and undoped single crystals”, P. Fielitz, S. Ganschow, K. Klemens, and G. Borchardt, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 41, (2021), 663-668."
File(s)JECESOC_accepted.pdf (517 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Heuer, AH
Finnis, MW
Foulkes, WMC
Chen, AP
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
We comment on recent observations of O and Al self-diffusion in single-crystal sapphire with variable doping concentrations of Mg and Ti by Fielitz et al [1]. The paper reports a null effect of aliovalent doping on oxygen diffusivity. We posit that the extensive heat treatment involved in their experimental protocol may have caused dopant evaporation near the surface, and therefore the null result in oxygen diffusivity, whereas an effect on Al diffusivity is still discernible due to a greater diffusion depth of Al. We propose that buffering mechanisms are ultimately responsible for modest increases of self-diffusion with respect to dopant concentrations; in the Mg-doped case, DFT calculations suggest that negatively charged Mg interstitial defects are the principal charge compensating defects for positively charged Mg substitutional ions.
Date Issued
2022-04-01
Date Acceptance
2021-12-13
Citation
Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2022, 42 (4), pp.1829-1831
ISSN
0955-2219
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
1829
End Page
1831
Journal / Book Title
Journal of the European Ceramic Society
Volume
42
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Subjects
Materials
0912 Materials Engineering
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-12-16