Blood eosinophils and inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-2 agonist efficacy in COPD
File(s)PavordEos.pdf (743.71 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective We performed a review of studies of
fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) (combination
inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist
(LABA)) in patients with COPD, which measured baseline
(pretreatment) blood eosinophil levels, to test whether
blood eosinophil levels ≥2% were associated with a
greater reduction in exacerbation rates with ICS therapy.
Methods Three studies of ≥1-year duration met the
inclusion criteria. Moderate and severe exacerbation rates
were analysed according to baseline blood eosinophil
levels (<2% vs ≥2%). At baseline, 57–75% of patients
had ≥2% blood eosinophils. Changes in FEV1 and St
George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were
compared by eosinophil level.
Results For patients with ≥2% eosinophils, FP/SAL
was associated with significant reductions in
exacerbation rates versus tiotropium (INSPIRE: n=719,
rate ratio (RR)=0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.92, p=0.006)
and versus placebo (TRISTAN: n=1049, RR=0.63, 95%
CI 0.50 to 0.79, p<0.001). No significant difference was
seen in the <2% eosinophil subgroup in either study
(INSPIRE: n=550, RR=1.18, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.51,
p=0.186; TRISTAN: n=354, RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.67 to
1.47, p=0.957, respectively). In SCO30002 (n=373), no
significant effects were observed (FP or FP/SAL vs
placebo). No relationship was observed in any study
between eosinophil subgroup and treatment effect on
FEV1 and SGRQ.
Discussion Baseline blood eosinophil levels may
represent an informative marker for exacerbation
reduction with ICS/LABA in patients with COPD and a
history of moderate/severe exacerbations.
fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) (combination
inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist
(LABA)) in patients with COPD, which measured baseline
(pretreatment) blood eosinophil levels, to test whether
blood eosinophil levels ≥2% were associated with a
greater reduction in exacerbation rates with ICS therapy.
Methods Three studies of ≥1-year duration met the
inclusion criteria. Moderate and severe exacerbation rates
were analysed according to baseline blood eosinophil
levels (<2% vs ≥2%). At baseline, 57–75% of patients
had ≥2% blood eosinophils. Changes in FEV1 and St
George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were
compared by eosinophil level.
Results For patients with ≥2% eosinophils, FP/SAL
was associated with significant reductions in
exacerbation rates versus tiotropium (INSPIRE: n=719,
rate ratio (RR)=0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.92, p=0.006)
and versus placebo (TRISTAN: n=1049, RR=0.63, 95%
CI 0.50 to 0.79, p<0.001). No significant difference was
seen in the <2% eosinophil subgroup in either study
(INSPIRE: n=550, RR=1.18, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.51,
p=0.186; TRISTAN: n=354, RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.67 to
1.47, p=0.957, respectively). In SCO30002 (n=373), no
significant effects were observed (FP or FP/SAL vs
placebo). No relationship was observed in any study
between eosinophil subgroup and treatment effect on
FEV1 and SGRQ.
Discussion Baseline blood eosinophil levels may
represent an informative marker for exacerbation
reduction with ICS/LABA in patients with COPD and a
history of moderate/severe exacerbations.
Date Issued
2015-11-19
Date Acceptance
2015-10-26
Citation
Thorax, 2015, 71, pp.118-125
ISSN
1468-3296
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Start Page
118
End Page
125
Journal / Book Title
Thorax
Volume
71
Copyright Statement
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially,
and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is
properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially,
and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is
properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License URL
Subjects
Respiratory System
1103 Clinical Sciences
Publication Status
Published