Cost-effectiveness of treatments for superficial venous refluxin patients with chronic venous ulceration.
File(s)Epstein_et_al-2017-BJS_Open.pdf (446.43 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Epstein, David
Gohel, MS
Heatley, FM
Davies, alun
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Venous leg ulcers impair quality of life significantly, with substantial costs to health services. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of interventional procedures alongside compression therapy versus compression therapy alone for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulceration.
Methods
A Markov decision analytical model was developed. The main outcome measures were quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) and lifetime costs per patient, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service at 2015 prices. Resource use included the initial procedures, compression therapy, primary care and outpatient consultations. The interventional procedures included superficial venous surgery, endothermal ablation and ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS). The study population was patients with a chronic venous ulcer who were eligible for either compression therapy or an interventional procedure. Data were obtained from systematic review and meta‐analysis of RCTs.
Results
Surgery gained 0·112 (95 per cent c.i. −0·011 to 0·213) QALYs compared with compression therapy alone, with a difference in lifetime costs of €−1330 (−3570 to 1262). Given the expected savings in community care, the procedure would pay for itself within 4 years. There was insufficient evidence regarding endothermal ablation and UGFS to draw conclusions.
Discussion
This modelling study found surgery to be more effective and less costly than compression therapy alone. Further RCT evidence is required for both endothermal ablation and UGFS.
Venous leg ulcers impair quality of life significantly, with substantial costs to health services. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of interventional procedures alongside compression therapy versus compression therapy alone for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulceration.
Methods
A Markov decision analytical model was developed. The main outcome measures were quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) and lifetime costs per patient, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service at 2015 prices. Resource use included the initial procedures, compression therapy, primary care and outpatient consultations. The interventional procedures included superficial venous surgery, endothermal ablation and ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS). The study population was patients with a chronic venous ulcer who were eligible for either compression therapy or an interventional procedure. Data were obtained from systematic review and meta‐analysis of RCTs.
Results
Surgery gained 0·112 (95 per cent c.i. −0·011 to 0·213) QALYs compared with compression therapy alone, with a difference in lifetime costs of €−1330 (−3570 to 1262). Given the expected savings in community care, the procedure would pay for itself within 4 years. There was insufficient evidence regarding endothermal ablation and UGFS to draw conclusions.
Discussion
This modelling study found surgery to be more effective and less costly than compression therapy alone. Further RCT evidence is required for both endothermal ablation and UGFS.
Date Issued
2018-08-01
Date Acceptance
2018-01-19
Citation
BJS Open, 2018, 2 (4), pp.203-212
ISSN
2474-9842
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
203
End Page
212
Journal / Book Title
BJS Open
Volume
2
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2018 The Authors.BJS Openpublished by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Surgery
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
FOAM SCLEROTHERAPY
LEG ULCERS
RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION
PRACTICE-GUIDELINES
SURGERY
MANAGEMENT
LASER
COMPRESSION
ULTRASOUND
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-05-10