Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  4. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  5. Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: systematic review and bibliometric analysis
 
  • Details
Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: systematic review and bibliometric analysis
File(s)
Marcus2018_Article_Robot-assistedStereotacticBrai.pdf (743.14 KB)
Published version
OA Location
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00381-018-3821-y?wt_mc=Internal.Event.1.SEM.ArticleAuthorOnlineFirst
Author(s)
Marcus, Hani J
Vakharia, Vejay N
Ourselin, Sebastien
Duncan, John
Tisdall, Martin
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic brain biopsy represents one of the earliest applications of surgical robotics. The aim of the present systematic review and bibliometric analysis was to evaluate the literature supporting robot-assisted brain biopsy and the extent to which the scientific community has accepted the technique. METHODS: The Cochrane and PubMed databases were searched over a 30-year period between 1st of January 1988 and 31st of December 2017. Titles and abstracts were screened to identify publications that met the following criteria: (1) featured patients with brain pathology, (2) undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy, (3) reporting robot-assisted surgery, and (4) outcome data were provided. The reference lists of selected studies were also sought, and expert opinion sought to identify further eligible publications. Selected manuscripts were then reviewed, and data extracted on effectiveness and safety. The status of scientific community acceptance was determined using a progressive scholarly acceptance analysis. RESULTS: All identified studies were non-randomised, including 1 retrospective cohort study and 14 case series or reports. The diagnostic biopsy rate varied from 75 to 100%, and the average target accuracy varied from 0.9 to 4.5 mm. Use of the robot was aborted in two operations owing to geometric inaccessibility and an error in image registration but no associated adverse events were reported. A compounding progressive scholarly acceptance analysis suggested a trend towards acceptance of the technique by the scientific community. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy is an increasingly mainstream tool in the neurosurgical armamentarium. Further evaluation should proceed along the IDEAL framework with research databases and comparative trials.
Date Issued
2018-07-01
Date Acceptance
2018-05-02
Citation
Child's Nervous System, 2018, 34 (7), pp.1299-1309
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/60241
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3821-y
ISSN
0256-7040
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Start Page
1299
End Page
1309
Journal / Book Title
Child's Nervous System
Volume
34
Issue
7
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744625
PII: 10.1007/s00381-018-3821-y
Subjects
DIPG
Diffuse intrinsic brainstem glioma
Robotics
Stereotaxy
Surgery
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
Germany
Date Publish Online
2018-05-10
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback