Strain migration during multiphase extension, Stord Basin, northern North Sea rift
File(s)bre.12522.pdf (5.86 MB)
Published version
OA Location
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
In regions experiencing multiple phases of extension, rift-related strain can vary along and across the basin during and between each phase, and the location of maximum extension can differ between the rift phase. Despite having a general understanding of multiphase rift kinematics, it remains unclear why the rift axis migrates between extension episodes. The role pre-existing structures play in influencing fault and basin geometries during later rifting events is also poorly understood. We study the Stord Basin, northern North Sea, a location characterised by strain migration between two rift episodes. To reveal and quantify the rift kinematics, we interpreted a dense grid of 2D seismic reflection profiles, produced time-structure and isochore (thickness) maps, collected quantitative fault kinematic data and calculated the amount of extension (β-factor). Our results show that the locations of basin-bounding fault systems were controlled by pre-existing crustal-scale shear zones. Within the basin, Permo-Triassic Rift Phase 1 (RP1) faults mainly developed orthogonal to the E-W extension direction. Rift faults control the locus of syn-RP1 deposition, whilst during the inter-rift stage, areas of clastic wedge progradation are more important in controlling sediment thickness trends. The calculated amount of RP1 extension (β-factor) for the Stord Basin is up to β = 1.55 (±10%, 55% extension). During the subsequent Middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous Rift Phase 2 (RP2), however, strain localised to the west along the present axis of the South Viking Graben, with the Stord Basin being almost completely abandoned. Rift axis migration during RP2 is interpreted to be related to changes in lithospheric strength profile, possibly related to the ultraslow extension (<1 mm/year during RP1), the long period of tectonic quiescence (ca. 50 myr) between RP1 and RP2 and possible underplating. Our results highlight the very heterogeneous nature of temporal and lateral strain migration during and between extension phases within a single rift basin.
Date Issued
2020-11-11
Date Acceptance
2020-10-05
Citation
Basin Research, 2020, 33 (2), pp.1474-1496
ISSN
0950-091X
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
1474
End Page
1496
Journal / Book Title
Basin Research
Volume
33
Issue
2
Copyright Statement
© 2020 The Authors. Basin Research published by International Association of Sedimentologists and European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Sponsor
Research Council of Norway
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000588333400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Grant Number
125000/807097
Subjects
Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
Geology
crustal extension
multirifted basin
Northern North Sea
seismic interpretation
tectonics and sedimentation
NORMAL-FAULT
SEISMIC-REFLECTION
VIKING GRABEN
STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION
SUNNHORDLAND REGION
STRETCHING MODEL
BASEMENT ROCKS
SHEAR ZONES
GROWTH
REACTIVATION
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2020-10-13