Systematic review of perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
File(s)Lap AAA manuscript v7.doc (130 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective To collate information available in the literature regarding perioperative outcomes following elective laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Materials and methods Electronic databases were searched and a systematic review was performed. In total, 1256 abstracts were screened, from which 10 studies were included for analysis. Perioperative and technical outcomes were analysed.
Results In the totally laparoscopic repair of infra-renal aneurysms (n = 302), 30-day mortality ranged between 0% and 6% and in the laparoscopic-assisted cases (n = 547) ranged between 0% and 7%. Of the former group, 5–30% of cases were converted to open repair, with 6% reintervention rate, whereas there was a 5–10% conversion and 3% reintervention rate in the latter group.
Conclusions The outcomes from selected patients in selected centres demonstrate that elective laparoscopic repair of aortic aneurysms is feasible and comparable in safety to open repair; it remains unclear, however, whether there are substantial advantages of this method compared with open and endovascular repair.
Materials and methods Electronic databases were searched and a systematic review was performed. In total, 1256 abstracts were screened, from which 10 studies were included for analysis. Perioperative and technical outcomes were analysed.
Results In the totally laparoscopic repair of infra-renal aneurysms (n = 302), 30-day mortality ranged between 0% and 6% and in the laparoscopic-assisted cases (n = 547) ranged between 0% and 7%. Of the former group, 5–30% of cases were converted to open repair, with 6% reintervention rate, whereas there was a 5–10% conversion and 3% reintervention rate in the latter group.
Conclusions The outcomes from selected patients in selected centres demonstrate that elective laparoscopic repair of aortic aneurysms is feasible and comparable in safety to open repair; it remains unclear, however, whether there are substantial advantages of this method compared with open and endovascular repair.
Date Issued
2015-10-01
Date Acceptance
2014-11-25
Citation
Vascular, 2015, 23 (5), pp.525-533
ISSN
1708-5381
Publisher
SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Start Page
525
End Page
533
Journal / Book Title
Vascular
Volume
23
Issue
5
Copyright Statement
© Sage 2015. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org10.1177/1708538114561823
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
laparoscopic
laparoscopic-assisted
endovascular aneurysm repair
systematic review
TERM COST-EFFECTIVENESS
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
COLON-CANCER
SURGERY
MANAGEMENT
RESECTION
DISEASE
Publication Status
Published