Argumentation-based recommendations: fantastic explanations and how to find them
File(s)rec_distribution.pdf (495.26 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Rago, Antonio
Cocarascu, oana
Toni, Francesca
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
A significant problem of recommender systems is their inability to explain recommendations, resulting in turn in ineffective feedback from users and the inability to adapt to users’ preferences. We propose a hybrid method for calculating predicted ratings, built upon an item/aspect-based graph with users’ partially given ratings, that can be naturally used to provide explanations for recommendations, extracted from user-tailored Tripolar Argumentation Frameworks (TFs). We show that our method can be understood as a gradual semantics for TFs, exhibiting a desirable, albeit weak, property of balance. We also show experimentally that our method is competitive in generating correct predictions, compared with state-of-the-art methods, and illustrate how users can interact with the generated explanations to improve quality of recommendations.
Date Issued
2018-07-13
Date Acceptance
2018-04-16
Citation
Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018, pp.1949-1955
ISBN
9780999241127
Start Page
1949
End Page
1955
Journal / Book Title
Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Copyright Statement
© 2018 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. All rights reserved.
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant Number
EP/P029558/1
Source
The Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (IJCAI 2018)
Publication Status
Published
Start Date
2018-07-13
Finish Date
2018-07-19
Coverage Spatial
Stockholm, Sweden
Date Publish Online
2018-07-13