Design and thermo-economic optimisation of small-scale bottoming ORC systems coupled to biomass CHP gasification cycles
File(s)ECOS2018_Simpsonetal-Final.pdf (3.48 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Simpson, Michael
Pantaleo, AM
De Palma, Pietro
Markides, Christos
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
Optimisat
ion of a small
-
scale bottoming organic Rankine c
ycle (ORC) engine is carried out for a combined
biomass
-
gasifier
-
CHP system, drawing heat from the
syn
gas
conditioning unit of the gasif
ier and the exhaust
gas of the internal combustion
(IC)
engine
. The optimisation considers different working fluids and selection
of a positive
-
displacement expander. Single
-
and two
-
stage screw expanders and single
-
stage reci
procating
-
piston expanders are modelled in order to capture the variation in their performance at a range of design
points.
Double
-
pipe heat exchangers are employed for both evaporator and condenser, le
ading to a low
-
cost
but bulky design.
The system is op
timised first for maximum electrical power output, and second for
minimum specific investment cost
(SIC)
. Cost correlations are used for each of the principal ORC
components.
The optimal design for minimum SIC is found to be a two
-
stage screw expander with
ethanol
as the working fluid, which produces a 13
.6
% increase in the electrical power output relative to the system
without an ORC.
The investment attractiveness of the whole system with and without the bottoming ORC is
assessed and the system is found to
be profitable for avoided electricity costs above 150 $/MWh
el
and
biomass costs of 50 $/t
, with the ORC making the system more attractive in all cases studied.
Discounted
payback periods range from 1
2
years at 150 $/MWh
el
to 3.
5
years at 250 $/MWh
el
for
the system with ORC
.
ion of a small
-
scale bottoming organic Rankine c
ycle (ORC) engine is carried out for a combined
biomass
-
gasifier
-
CHP system, drawing heat from the
syn
gas
conditioning unit of the gasif
ier and the exhaust
gas of the internal combustion
(IC)
engine
. The optimisation considers different working fluids and selection
of a positive
-
displacement expander. Single
-
and two
-
stage screw expanders and single
-
stage reci
procating
-
piston expanders are modelled in order to capture the variation in their performance at a range of design
points.
Double
-
pipe heat exchangers are employed for both evaporator and condenser, le
ading to a low
-
cost
but bulky design.
The system is op
timised first for maximum electrical power output, and second for
minimum specific investment cost
(SIC)
. Cost correlations are used for each of the principal ORC
components.
The optimal design for minimum SIC is found to be a two
-
stage screw expander with
ethanol
as the working fluid, which produces a 13
.6
% increase in the electrical power output relative to the system
without an ORC.
The investment attractiveness of the whole system with and without the bottoming ORC is
assessed and the system is found to
be profitable for avoided electricity costs above 150 $/MWh
el
and
biomass costs of 50 $/t
, with the ORC making the system more attractive in all cases studied.
Discounted
payback periods range from 1
2
years at 150 $/MWh
el
to 3.
5
years at 250 $/MWh
el
for
the system with ORC
.
Date Issued
2018-06-17
Date Acceptance
2018-05-07
Citation
Proceedings of ECOS 2018, 2018
Publisher
ECOS
Journal / Book Title
Proceedings of ECOS 2018
Copyright Statement
© 2018 The Author(s)
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant Number
EP/P004709/1
Source
ECOS 2018 - 31st International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems.
Publication Status
Published
Start Date
2018-06-17
Finish Date
2018-06-21
Coverage Spatial
Guimaraes, Portugal