Randomized clinical trial of the impact of surgical ward-care checklists on postoperative care in a simulated environment
Author(s)
Pucher, PH
Aggarwal, R
Qurashi, M
Singh, P
Darzi, A
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Complications are a common and accepted risk of surgery. Failure to optimize the management of patients who suffer postoperative morbidity may result in poorer surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate a checklist‐based tool to improve and standardize care of postoperative complications.
Methods
Surgical trainees conducted baseline ward rounds of three patients with common postoperative complications in a high‐fidelity simulated ward environment. Subjects were randomized to intervention or control groups, and final ward rounds were conducted with or without the aid of checklists for management of postoperative complications. Adherence to critical care processes was assessed, in addition to technical (Surgical Ward‐care Assessment Tool, SWAT) and non‐technical (Ward NOn‐TECHnical Skills (W‐NOTECHS) scale) performance. Subjects completed a feedback questionnaire regarding their perception of the checklists.
Results
Twenty trainees completed 120 patient assessments. All intervention group subjects opted to use the checklists, resulting in significantly fewer critical errors compared with controls (median (i.q.r.) 0 (0–0) versus 60 (40–73) per cent; P < 0·001). The intervention group demonstrated improved patient management (SWAT‐M) (P < 0·001) and non‐technical skills (P = 0·043) between baseline and final ward rounds, whereas controls did not (P = 0·571 and P = 0·809 respectively). A small learning effect was seen with improvement in patient assessment (SWAT‐A) in both groups (P < 0·001). Intervention group subjects found checklists easy and effective to use, and would want them used for their own care if they were to experience postoperative complications.
Conclusion
Checklist use resulted in significantly improved standardization, evidence‐based management of postoperative complications, and quality of ward rounds. Simulation‐based piloting aided appropriate use of checklists and staff engagement. Checklists represent a low‐cost intervention to reduce rates of failure to rescue and to improve patient care.
Complications are a common and accepted risk of surgery. Failure to optimize the management of patients who suffer postoperative morbidity may result in poorer surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate a checklist‐based tool to improve and standardize care of postoperative complications.
Methods
Surgical trainees conducted baseline ward rounds of three patients with common postoperative complications in a high‐fidelity simulated ward environment. Subjects were randomized to intervention or control groups, and final ward rounds were conducted with or without the aid of checklists for management of postoperative complications. Adherence to critical care processes was assessed, in addition to technical (Surgical Ward‐care Assessment Tool, SWAT) and non‐technical (Ward NOn‐TECHnical Skills (W‐NOTECHS) scale) performance. Subjects completed a feedback questionnaire regarding their perception of the checklists.
Results
Twenty trainees completed 120 patient assessments. All intervention group subjects opted to use the checklists, resulting in significantly fewer critical errors compared with controls (median (i.q.r.) 0 (0–0) versus 60 (40–73) per cent; P < 0·001). The intervention group demonstrated improved patient management (SWAT‐M) (P < 0·001) and non‐technical skills (P = 0·043) between baseline and final ward rounds, whereas controls did not (P = 0·571 and P = 0·809 respectively). A small learning effect was seen with improvement in patient assessment (SWAT‐A) in both groups (P < 0·001). Intervention group subjects found checklists easy and effective to use, and would want them used for their own care if they were to experience postoperative complications.
Conclusion
Checklist use resulted in significantly improved standardization, evidence‐based management of postoperative complications, and quality of ward rounds. Simulation‐based piloting aided appropriate use of checklists and staff engagement. Checklists represent a low‐cost intervention to reduce rates of failure to rescue and to improve patient care.
Date Issued
2014-12-01
Date Acceptance
2014-08-20
Citation
British Journal of Surgery, 2014, 101 (13), pp.1666-1673
ISSN
1365-2168
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
1666
End Page
1673
Journal / Book Title
British Journal of Surgery
Volume
101
Issue
13
Copyright Statement
© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the accepted version of the following article: BJS 2014; 101: 1666–1673, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9654
Sponsor
National Institute for Health Research
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000344794500006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Grant Number
NF-SI-0510-10186
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Surgery
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL
SAFETY CHECKLIST
COLORECTAL-CANCER
INPATIENT SURGERY
PATIENT OUTCOMES
MORTALITY
FAILURE
RESCUE
MORBIDITY
IMPLEMENTATION
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2014-10-28