Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Engineering
  3. Chemical Engineering
  4. Chemical Engineering
  5. Electrolyzer cell-methanation/Sabatier reactors integration for power-to-gas energy storage: Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization
 
  • Details
Electrolyzer cell-methanation/Sabatier reactors integration for power-to-gas energy storage: Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization
File(s)
JaliliEtAl-Manuscript(AcceptedVersion).pdf (1.18 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Jalili, Mohammad
Ghazanfari Holagh, Shahriyar
Chitsaz, Ata
Song, Jian
Markides, Christos N
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to compare and optimize two power-to-gas energy storage systems from a thermo-economic perspective. The first system is based on a solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) combined with a methanation reactor, and the second is based on a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer cell (PEMEC) integrated into a Sabatier reactor. The first system relies on the co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide followed by methanation, whereas the basis of the second system is hydrogen production and conversion into methane via a Sabatier reaction. The systems are also analyzed for being applied in different countries and being fed by different renewable and non- renewable power sources. Simulation results of both systems were compared with similar studies from the literature; the errors were negligible, acknowledging the reliability and accuracy of the simulations. The results reveal that for the same carbon dioxide availability (i.e., flow rate), the SOEC-based system has higher exergy and power-to-gas efficiencies, and lower electricity consumption compared to the PEMEC-based system. However, the PEMEC-based system produces 1.2 % more methane, also with a lower heating value (LHV) of the generated gas mixture that is 7.6 % higher than that of the SOEC-based system. Additionally, the levelized cost of energy (based on the LHV) of the SOEC-based system is found to be 11 % lower. A lifecycle analysis indicates that the lowest lifecycle cost is attained when solar PV systems are employed as the electricity supply option. Eventually, the SOEC-based system is found to be more attractive for power-to-gas purposes from a thermo-economic standpoint.
Date Issued
2023-01
Date Acceptance
2022-10-30
Citation
Applied Energy, 2023, 329, pp.1-17
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/100882
URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922015252?via%3Dihub
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120268
ISSN
0306-2619
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Start Page
1
End Page
17
Journal / Book Title
Applied Energy
Volume
329
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922015252?via%3Dihub
Grant Number
EP/R045518/1
UOB107926
Subjects
Energy
09 Engineering
14 Economics
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
120268
Date Publish Online
2022-11-09
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback