Optimizing atrio-ventricular delay in pacemakers using potentially implantable physiological biomarkers
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Hemodynamically optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay can be derived by echocardiography or beat-by-beat blood pressure (BP) measurements, but analysis is labor intensive. Laser Doppler perfusion monitoring measures blood flow and can be incorporated into future implantable cardiac devices.
We assess whether laser Doppler can be used instead of BP to optimize AV delay.
Methods
Fifty eight patients underwent 94 AV delay optimizations with biventricular or His-bundle pacing using laser Doppler and simultaneous noninvasive beat-by-beat BP. Optimal AV delay was defined using a curve of hemodynamic response to switching from AAI (reference state) to DDD (test state) at several AV delays (40–320 ms), with automatic quality control checking precision of the optimum.
Five subsequent patients underwent an extended protocol to test the impact of greater numbers of alternations on optimization quality.
Results
55/94 optimizations passed quality control resulting in an optimal AV delay on laser Doppler similar to that derived by BP (median absolute deviation 12 ms).
An extended protocol with increasing number of replicates consistently improved quality and reduced disagreement between laser Doppler and BP optima. With only five replicates, no optimization passed quality control, and the median absolute deviation would be 29 ms. These improved progressively until at 50 replicates, all optimizations passed quality control and the median absolute deviation was only 13 ms.
Conclusions
Laser Doppler perfusion produces hemodynamic optima equivalent to BP. Quality control can be automatic. Adding more replicates, consistently improves quality. Future implantable devices could use such methods to dynamically and reliably optimize AV delays.
Hemodynamically optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay can be derived by echocardiography or beat-by-beat blood pressure (BP) measurements, but analysis is labor intensive. Laser Doppler perfusion monitoring measures blood flow and can be incorporated into future implantable cardiac devices.
We assess whether laser Doppler can be used instead of BP to optimize AV delay.
Methods
Fifty eight patients underwent 94 AV delay optimizations with biventricular or His-bundle pacing using laser Doppler and simultaneous noninvasive beat-by-beat BP. Optimal AV delay was defined using a curve of hemodynamic response to switching from AAI (reference state) to DDD (test state) at several AV delays (40–320 ms), with automatic quality control checking precision of the optimum.
Five subsequent patients underwent an extended protocol to test the impact of greater numbers of alternations on optimization quality.
Results
55/94 optimizations passed quality control resulting in an optimal AV delay on laser Doppler similar to that derived by BP (median absolute deviation 12 ms).
An extended protocol with increasing number of replicates consistently improved quality and reduced disagreement between laser Doppler and BP optima. With only five replicates, no optimization passed quality control, and the median absolute deviation would be 29 ms. These improved progressively until at 50 replicates, all optimizations passed quality control and the median absolute deviation was only 13 ms.
Conclusions
Laser Doppler perfusion produces hemodynamic optima equivalent to BP. Quality control can be automatic. Adding more replicates, consistently improves quality. Future implantable devices could use such methods to dynamically and reliably optimize AV delays.
Date Issued
2022-01-28
Date Acceptance
2021-12-19
Citation
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2022, 45 (4), pp.461-470
ISSN
0147-8389
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
461
End Page
470
Journal / Book Title
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume
45
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2021 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Identifier
https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000748287700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
ALGORITHMS
atrioventricular delay
AV DELAY
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
CARDIAC-RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
DEFIBRILLATOR
EFFICIENCY
Engineering
Engineering, Biomedical
haemodynamics
INTERVENTRICULAR DELAY
laser Doppler perfusion monitoring
LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
MICROCIRCULATION
optimization
OPTIMIZATION
pacemaker
QUANTIFICATION
Science & Technology
Technology
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-12-30