Implicit field learning for unsupervised anomaly detection in medical
images
images
File(s)2106.05214v1.pdf (595 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Marimont, Sergio Naval
Tarroni, Giacomo
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
We propose a novel unsupervised out-of-distribution detection method for
medical images based on implicit fields image representations. In our approach,
an auto-decoder feed-forward neural network learns the distribution of healthy
images in the form of a mapping between spatial coordinates and probabilities
over a proxy for tissue types. At inference time, the learnt distribution is
used to retrieve, from a given test image, a restoration, i.e. an image
maximally consistent with the input one but belonging to the healthy
distribution. Anomalies are localized using the voxel-wise probability
predicted by our model for the restored image. We tested our approach in the
task of unsupervised localization of gliomas on brain MR images and compared it
to several other VAE-based anomaly detection methods. Results show that the
proposed technique substantially outperforms them (average DICE 0.640 vs 0.518
for the best performing VAE-based alternative) while also requiring
considerably less computing time.
medical images based on implicit fields image representations. In our approach,
an auto-decoder feed-forward neural network learns the distribution of healthy
images in the form of a mapping between spatial coordinates and probabilities
over a proxy for tissue types. At inference time, the learnt distribution is
used to retrieve, from a given test image, a restoration, i.e. an image
maximally consistent with the input one but belonging to the healthy
distribution. Anomalies are localized using the voxel-wise probability
predicted by our model for the restored image. We tested our approach in the
task of unsupervised localization of gliomas on brain MR images and compared it
to several other VAE-based anomaly detection methods. Results show that the
proposed technique substantially outperforms them (average DICE 0.640 vs 0.518
for the best performing VAE-based alternative) while also requiring
considerably less computing time.
Date Issued
2021-09-21
Date Acceptance
2021-05-14
Citation
2021, pp.189-198
Publisher
Springer
Start Page
189
End Page
198
Copyright Statement
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_18
Identifier
http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05214v1
Source
MICCAI 2021
Subjects
eess.IV
eess.IV
cs.CV
cs.LG
Notes
10 pages, 3 figures. Accepted for publication in MICCAI 2021
Publication Status
Published
Start Date
2021-09-27
Finish Date
2021-10-01
Coverage Spatial
Virtual event
Date Publish Online
2021-09-21