Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-supported foorbridges
File(s)
Author(s)
Georgiadis, Konstantinos
Type
Thesis
Abstract
Under-deck cable-supported footbridges are slender and effective structures comprising of cables located
underneath the deck. They can be sorted into under-deck cable-stayed (UDCS), under-deck
suspension (UDS) and stress-ribbon (SR) footbridges. All of them promote the axial behaviour and
reduce the amount of required construction materials. In addition, to their high structural efficiency
and sustainability they also possess aesthetic and construction advantages compared to conventional
footbridges for covering medium spans. Nevertheless, they become more prone to vibrations that
can be activated from the passage of pedestrians during service. In the present work, the dynamic
response of UDCS, UDS, and SR footbridges under pedestrian loading in service was examined in detail.
Due to the shortcomings of the current codes of practice to represent realistically human-induced
vibrations, a stochastic pedestrian load model was implemented. This model simulates the actions
induced by individuals, taking into account the inter-subject and intra-subject variability as well as the
pedestrian-structure and pedestrian-pedestrian interaction. The pedestrian load model was applied
to representative UDCS, UDS and SR benchmark footbridges in order to investigate their dynamic
response. The effects of different sources of non-linearities were examined. As for all the benchmark
footbridge configurations, when designed to fulfil only ultimate limit states, the acceleration response
was found unsatisfactory, yielding to minimum comfort for their users, extensive parametric studies
were carried out aiming to find critical design parameters able to improve their dynamic behaviour.
Based on the investigation of the benchmark configurations and the parametric studies a set of comprehensive
design criteria and recommendations for UDCS, UDS, and SR footbridges were proposed.
For all those cases, decreasing the deck slenderness was found the most cost-effective way to improve
the dynamic response and increase users’ comfort within appropriate design limits.
underneath the deck. They can be sorted into under-deck cable-stayed (UDCS), under-deck
suspension (UDS) and stress-ribbon (SR) footbridges. All of them promote the axial behaviour and
reduce the amount of required construction materials. In addition, to their high structural efficiency
and sustainability they also possess aesthetic and construction advantages compared to conventional
footbridges for covering medium spans. Nevertheless, they become more prone to vibrations that
can be activated from the passage of pedestrians during service. In the present work, the dynamic
response of UDCS, UDS, and SR footbridges under pedestrian loading in service was examined in detail.
Due to the shortcomings of the current codes of practice to represent realistically human-induced
vibrations, a stochastic pedestrian load model was implemented. This model simulates the actions
induced by individuals, taking into account the inter-subject and intra-subject variability as well as the
pedestrian-structure and pedestrian-pedestrian interaction. The pedestrian load model was applied
to representative UDCS, UDS and SR benchmark footbridges in order to investigate their dynamic
response. The effects of different sources of non-linearities were examined. As for all the benchmark
footbridge configurations, when designed to fulfil only ultimate limit states, the acceleration response
was found unsatisfactory, yielding to minimum comfort for their users, extensive parametric studies
were carried out aiming to find critical design parameters able to improve their dynamic behaviour.
Based on the investigation of the benchmark configurations and the parametric studies a set of comprehensive
design criteria and recommendations for UDCS, UDS, and SR footbridges were proposed.
For all those cases, decreasing the deck slenderness was found the most cost-effective way to improve
the dynamic response and increase users’ comfort within appropriate design limits.
Version
Open Access
Date Issued
2020-06
Date Awarded
2020-09
Copyright Statement
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives Licence
Advisor
Ruiz-Teran, Ana M.
Stafford, Peter J.
Sponsor
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Publisher Department
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)