Inferring the reproduction number using the renewal equation in heterogeneous epidemics
Author(s)
Green, William D
Ferguson, Neil M
Cori, Anne
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Real-time estimation of the reproduction number has become the focus of
modelling groups around the world as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic unfolds.
One of the most widely adopted means of inference of the reproduction
number is via the renewal equation, which uses the incidence of infection
and the generation time distribution. In this paper, we derive a multi-type
equivalent to the renewal equation to estimate a reproduction number
which accounts for heterogeneity in transmissibility including through
asymptomatic transmission, symptomatic isolation and vaccination. We
demonstrate how use of the renewal equation that misses these heterogeneities
can result in biased estimates of the reproduction number. While the
bias is small with symptomatic isolation, it can be much larger with asymptomatic
transmission or transmission from vaccinated individuals if these
groups exhibit substantially different generation time distributions to unvaccinated
symptomatic transmitters, whose generation time distribution is
often well defined. The bias in estimate becomes larger with greater population
size or transmissibility of the poorly characterized group. We apply
our methodology to Ebola in West Africa in 2014 and the SARS-CoV-2 in
the UK in 2020–2021.
modelling groups around the world as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic unfolds.
One of the most widely adopted means of inference of the reproduction
number is via the renewal equation, which uses the incidence of infection
and the generation time distribution. In this paper, we derive a multi-type
equivalent to the renewal equation to estimate a reproduction number
which accounts for heterogeneity in transmissibility including through
asymptomatic transmission, symptomatic isolation and vaccination. We
demonstrate how use of the renewal equation that misses these heterogeneities
can result in biased estimates of the reproduction number. While the
bias is small with symptomatic isolation, it can be much larger with asymptomatic
transmission or transmission from vaccinated individuals if these
groups exhibit substantially different generation time distributions to unvaccinated
symptomatic transmitters, whose generation time distribution is
often well defined. The bias in estimate becomes larger with greater population
size or transmissibility of the poorly characterized group. We apply
our methodology to Ebola in West Africa in 2014 and the SARS-CoV-2 in
the UK in 2020–2021.
Date Issued
2022-03-30
Date Acceptance
2022-01-28
Citation
Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2022, 19 (188)
ISSN
1742-5662
Publisher
The Royal Society
Journal / Book Title
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume
19
Issue
188
Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original
author and source are credited.
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original
author and source are credited.
License URL
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000778665500004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Science & Technology - Other Topics
heterogeneous
epidemics
renewal equation
generation time
asymptomatic transmission
TRANSMISSION DYNAMICS
EBOLA-VIRUS
HERD-IMMUNITY
CORONAVIRUS
VACCINATION
STRATEGIES
EXCRETION
FRAMEWORK
COVID-19
CONTACTS
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 20210429