Dietary assessment of British police force employees: a description of diet record coding procedures and cross-sectional evaluation of dietary energy intake reporting (the airwave health monitoring study)
File(s)e012927.full.pdf (1.01 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objectives: Dietary intake is a key aspect of occupational health.
To capture the characteristics of
dietary behaviour that is affected by occupational environment that may impact on disease risk,
collection of prospective multi
-
day dietary records are required. The aims of this paper are to: i) the
collection of multi da
y dietary data in the
Airwaves health monitoring study, ii) describe the dietary
coding procedures applied and ii
i
) investigate the
plausibility
of dietary reporting
in this
occupational cohort.
Design: A dietary coding protocol for this large
-
scale study
was developed to minimise coding error
rate. Participants (
n
4,412) who completed 7
-
day food records were included for cross
-
sectional
analyses. Energy intake misreporting was
estimated using the Goldberg method. Multivariate
logistic regression models
we
re applied to
determine participant characteristics associated with
energy intake misreporting.
Setting: British police force employees enrolled (2007 to 2012) into the Airwave Health Monitoring
Study.
Results: The mean code error rate per food diary was
3.7% (SD 3.2%). The strongest predictors of
energy intake under
-
reporting were body mass index (BMI) and physical activity. Compared to
participants with
BMI <25kg/m2,
those
with BMI >30kg/m2 had increased odds of being classified
as under
-
reporting energ
y intake (men OR 5.20 95%CI 3.92, 6.89; women OR 2.66 95%CI 1.85,
3.83). Men and women in the highest physical activity category compared to the lowest were also
more likely to be classified as under
-
reporting (men OR 3.33 95%CI 2.46, 4.50; women OR 4.34
9
5%CI 2.91, 6.55).
Conclusions: A reproducible dietary record coding procedure
h
as been developed to minimise
coding error in complex 7
-
day diet diaries. The prevalence of energy intake under
-
reporting is
comparable to
existing
national UK cohort
s
and, in agreement with previous studies classification
of under
-
reporting was biased towards specific sub groups of participants.
To capture the characteristics of
dietary behaviour that is affected by occupational environment that may impact on disease risk,
collection of prospective multi
-
day dietary records are required. The aims of this paper are to: i) the
collection of multi da
y dietary data in the
Airwaves health monitoring study, ii) describe the dietary
coding procedures applied and ii
i
) investigate the
plausibility
of dietary reporting
in this
occupational cohort.
Design: A dietary coding protocol for this large
-
scale study
was developed to minimise coding error
rate. Participants (
n
4,412) who completed 7
-
day food records were included for cross
-
sectional
analyses. Energy intake misreporting was
estimated using the Goldberg method. Multivariate
logistic regression models
we
re applied to
determine participant characteristics associated with
energy intake misreporting.
Setting: British police force employees enrolled (2007 to 2012) into the Airwave Health Monitoring
Study.
Results: The mean code error rate per food diary was
3.7% (SD 3.2%). The strongest predictors of
energy intake under
-
reporting were body mass index (BMI) and physical activity. Compared to
participants with
BMI <25kg/m2,
those
with BMI >30kg/m2 had increased odds of being classified
as under
-
reporting energ
y intake (men OR 5.20 95%CI 3.92, 6.89; women OR 2.66 95%CI 1.85,
3.83). Men and women in the highest physical activity category compared to the lowest were also
more likely to be classified as under
-
reporting (men OR 3.33 95%CI 2.46, 4.50; women OR 4.34
9
5%CI 2.91, 6.55).
Conclusions: A reproducible dietary record coding procedure
h
as been developed to minimise
coding error in complex 7
-
day diet diaries. The prevalence of energy intake under
-
reporting is
comparable to
existing
national UK cohort
s
and, in agreement with previous studies classification
of under
-
reporting was biased towards specific sub groups of participants.
Date Issued
2017-04-01
Date Acceptance
2016-12-23
Citation
BMJ Open, 2017, 7
ISSN
2044-6055
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
BMJ Open
Volume
7
Copyright Statement
© 2017 The Authors. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for
commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for
commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sponsor
Home Office
National Institute for Health Research
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust- BRC Funding
National Institute for Health Research
Medical Research Council (MRC)
National Institute for Health Research
Grant Number
PG0484
NF-SI-0611-10136
RDC01 79560
RDC01 79560
MR/L01341X/1
RTJ6219303-1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY
CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE
EATING FREQUENCY
PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY
NATIONAL-HEALTH
ADULTS
RISK
FOOD
VALIDATION
WOMEN
EPIDEMIOLOGY
NUTRITION & DIETETICS
OCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
e012927