The influence of muscle pennation angle and cross-sectional area on contact forces in the ankle joint
File(s)
Author(s)
Sopher, R
Amis, A
Davies, D
Jeffers, J
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Data about a muscle’s fibre pennation angle and physiological cross-sectional area are used in musculoskeletal modelling to estimate muscle forces, which are used to calculate joint contact forces. For the leg, muscle architecture data are derived from studies that measured pennation angle at the muscle surface, but not deep within it. Musculoskeletal models developed to estimate joint contact loads have usually been based on the mean values of pennation angle and physiological cross-sectional area.
Therefore, the first aim of this study was to investigate differences between superficial and deep pennation angles within each muscle acting over the ankle and predict how differences may influence muscle forces calculated in musculoskeletal modelling. The second aim was to investigate how inter-subject variability in physiological cross-sectional area and pennation angle affects calculated ankle contact forces.
Eight cadaveric legs were dissected to excise the muscles acting over the ankle. The mean surface and deep pennation angles, fibre length and physiological cross-sectional area were measured. Cluster analysis was applied to group the muscles according to their architectural characteristics. A previously validated OpenSim model was used to estimate ankle muscle forces and contact loads using architecture data from all eight limbs.
The mean surface pennation angle for soleus was significantly greater (54%) than the mean deep pennation angle. Cluster analysis revealed three groups of muscles with similar architecture and function: deep plantarflexors and peroneals, superficial plantarflexors and dorsiflexors. Peak ankle contact force was predicted to occur before toe-off, with magnitude greater than five times bodyweight. Inter-specimen variability in contact force was smallest at peak force.
These findings will help improve the development of experimental and computational musculoskeletal models by providing data to estimate force based on both surface and deep pennation angles. Inter-subject variability in muscle architecture affected ankle muscle and contact loads only slightly. The link between muscle architecture and function contributes to the understanding of the relationship between muscle structure and function.
Therefore, the first aim of this study was to investigate differences between superficial and deep pennation angles within each muscle acting over the ankle and predict how differences may influence muscle forces calculated in musculoskeletal modelling. The second aim was to investigate how inter-subject variability in physiological cross-sectional area and pennation angle affects calculated ankle contact forces.
Eight cadaveric legs were dissected to excise the muscles acting over the ankle. The mean surface and deep pennation angles, fibre length and physiological cross-sectional area were measured. Cluster analysis was applied to group the muscles according to their architectural characteristics. A previously validated OpenSim model was used to estimate ankle muscle forces and contact loads using architecture data from all eight limbs.
The mean surface pennation angle for soleus was significantly greater (54%) than the mean deep pennation angle. Cluster analysis revealed three groups of muscles with similar architecture and function: deep plantarflexors and peroneals, superficial plantarflexors and dorsiflexors. Peak ankle contact force was predicted to occur before toe-off, with magnitude greater than five times bodyweight. Inter-specimen variability in contact force was smallest at peak force.
These findings will help improve the development of experimental and computational musculoskeletal models by providing data to estimate force based on both surface and deep pennation angles. Inter-subject variability in muscle architecture affected ankle muscle and contact loads only slightly. The link between muscle architecture and function contributes to the understanding of the relationship between muscle structure and function.
Date Issued
2016-09-22
Date Acceptance
2016-08-01
Citation
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 2016, 52 (1), pp.12-23
ISSN
0309-3247
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Start Page
12
End Page
23
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
Volume
52
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2016 IMechE. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
License URL
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Wellcome Trust
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant Number
N/A
088844/Z/09/Z
EP/K027549/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Engineering, Mechanical
Mechanics
Materials Science, Characterization & Testing
Engineering
Materials Science
Ankle
muscle architecture
surface
deep pennation angle
physiological cross-sectional area
joint reaction forces
LOWER-LIMB MUSCLES
LOWER-LEG MUSCLES
IN-VIVO
LOWER-EXTREMITY
STANCE PHASE
MOMENT ARM
ARCHITECTURE
MODEL
GAIT
WALKING
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering & Transports
Publication Status
Published