A polygenic biomarker to identify patients with severe hypercholesterolemia of polygenic origin
File(s)mgg3.1248.pdf (541.04 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
David, Alessia
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Severe hypercholesterolemia (HC, LDL‐C > 4.9 mmol/L) affects over 30 million people worldwide. In this study, we validated a new polygenic risk score (PRS) for LDL‐C.
Methods
Summary statistics from the Global Lipid Genome Consortium and genotype data from two large populations were used.
Results
A 36‐SNP PRS was generated using data for 2,197 white Americans. In a replication cohort of 4,787 Finns, the PRS was strongly associated with the LDL‐C trait and explained 8% of its variability (p = 10–41). After risk categorization, the risk of having HC was higher in the high‐ versus low‐risk group (RR = 4.17, p < 1 × 10−7). Compared to a 12‐SNP LDL‐C raising score (currently used in the United Kingdom), the PRS explained more LDL‐C variability (8% vs. 6%). Among Finns with severe HC, 53% (66/124) versus 44% (55/124) were classified as high risk by the PRS and LDL‐C raising score, respectively. Moreover, 54% of individuals with severe HC defined as low risk by the LDL‐C raising score were reclassified to intermediate or high risk by the new PRS.
Conclusion
The new PRS has a better predictive role in identifying HC of polygenic origin compared to the currently available method and can better stratify patients into diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms.
Severe hypercholesterolemia (HC, LDL‐C > 4.9 mmol/L) affects over 30 million people worldwide. In this study, we validated a new polygenic risk score (PRS) for LDL‐C.
Methods
Summary statistics from the Global Lipid Genome Consortium and genotype data from two large populations were used.
Results
A 36‐SNP PRS was generated using data for 2,197 white Americans. In a replication cohort of 4,787 Finns, the PRS was strongly associated with the LDL‐C trait and explained 8% of its variability (p = 10–41). After risk categorization, the risk of having HC was higher in the high‐ versus low‐risk group (RR = 4.17, p < 1 × 10−7). Compared to a 12‐SNP LDL‐C raising score (currently used in the United Kingdom), the PRS explained more LDL‐C variability (8% vs. 6%). Among Finns with severe HC, 53% (66/124) versus 44% (55/124) were classified as high risk by the PRS and LDL‐C raising score, respectively. Moreover, 54% of individuals with severe HC defined as low risk by the LDL‐C raising score were reclassified to intermediate or high risk by the new PRS.
Conclusion
The new PRS has a better predictive role in identifying HC of polygenic origin compared to the currently available method and can better stratify patients into diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms.
Date Issued
2020-04-19
Date Acceptance
2020-03-02
Citation
Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine, 2020, 8 (6), pp.1-9
ISSN
2324-9269
Publisher
Wiley Open Access
Start Page
1
End Page
9
Journal / Book Title
Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine
Volume
8
Issue
6
Copyright Statement
© 2020 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sponsor
Wellcome Trust
Identifier
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mgg3.1248
Grant Number
WT/104955/Z/14/Z
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Genetics & Heredity
hypercholesterolemia
lipids
polygenic risk score
risk stratification
MONOGENIC FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA
GENETIC RISK SCORE
DISEASE
hypercholesterolemia
lipids
polygenic risk score
risk stratification
0304 Medicinal and Biomolecular Chemistry
0604 Genetics
1103 Clinical Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2020-04-19