Comparative assessment of finite element and strut and tie based design methods for deep beams
File(s)Magazine of Concrete Research_65_2013(2).pdf (426.75 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Amini Najafian, H
Vollum, RL
Fang, L
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
This paper considers the design and analysis of a series of one and two span deep beams which have been tested previously. The beams are assessed with nonlinear finite element analysis and two alternative strut and tie models. The reinforcement is subsequently designed to resist between 60-80% of the measured failure loads using a semi-automated finite element based procedure and the two strut and tie models. The semi-automated design procedure is implemented in NonOpt which is a FORTRAN program that works in conjunction with the finite element program DIANA. The reinforcement is designed to resist stresses calculated in a nonlinear finite element analysis. The case studies with NonOpt examine the influence of basing the initial reinforcement design on either a linear or nonlinear finite element analysis. The influence of tension stiffening is also considered. The least reinforcement weight is obtained when the initial design is based on a nonlinear analysis without tension stiffening.
Date Issued
2013-06
Citation
Magazine of Concrete Research, 2013, pp.970-986
ISSN
0024-9831
Start Page
970
End Page
986
Journal / Book Title
Magazine of Concrete Research
Copyright Statement
© 2013 Thomas Telford Ltd. Original article available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/macr.13.00006. Permission is granted by ICE Publishing to print one copy for personal use. Any other use of these PDF files is subject to reprint fees.
Publication Status
Published