296: Determinants of ARDS resolution and duration in patients supported with extracorporeal support
File(s)SCCM Conference Abstract - Draft 1.docx (24.24 KB)
Submitted version
Author(s)
Shroff, Diana
Garfield, Benjamin
Banya, Winston
Ledot, Stephane
Patel, Brijesh
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to provide life-sustaining support to patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Its use has dramatically increased during the current COVID-19 pandemic. Delayed resolution is associated with poorer patient outcomes and current prediction scores focus on mortality. This study aimed to identify pre-ECMO clinical characteristics that determine early ARDS resolution, to assist clinicians in planning appropriate treatment.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, point of referral data from patients treated with veno-venous ECMO at a regional centre (2017-2019) were analysed. Patients aged 18 years and above with ARDS, defined by the Berlin criteria, were included. The primary outcome was early ARDS resolution, defined as liberation from ECMO within 14 days, or non-early ARDS resolution, defined as ECMO run longer than 14 days (survivors and non-survivors). Multiple logistic and backwards step-wise logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors. Multiple imputation was used for missing values.
Results: Of the 159 patients included in the study, 86 (54.1%) had early ARDS resolution. Following univariate analysis and exclusion of colinear variables, multiple logistic regression showed aspiration pneumonia to be a significant predictor of early resolution. Plateau pressure, social alcohol use and prophylactic heparin were significant predictors of non-early resolution. Backwards step-wise regression retained plateau pressure (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.24, p=0.001), social alcohol use (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.17-6.34, p=0.020), prophylactic heparin (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.46-7.21, p=0.004), aspiration pneumonia (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.62, p=0.006) and log (FiO2) (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.005-0.64, p=0.02) as independent significant predictors.
Conclusions: This study identified important clinical characteristics at the point of referral, in particular the aetiology of ARDS, that predict disease dynamics in ARDS patients receiving ECMO. These can help better prepare families, inform clinicians, plan resource utilization and guide future research into severe ARDS.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, point of referral data from patients treated with veno-venous ECMO at a regional centre (2017-2019) were analysed. Patients aged 18 years and above with ARDS, defined by the Berlin criteria, were included. The primary outcome was early ARDS resolution, defined as liberation from ECMO within 14 days, or non-early ARDS resolution, defined as ECMO run longer than 14 days (survivors and non-survivors). Multiple logistic and backwards step-wise logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors. Multiple imputation was used for missing values.
Results: Of the 159 patients included in the study, 86 (54.1%) had early ARDS resolution. Following univariate analysis and exclusion of colinear variables, multiple logistic regression showed aspiration pneumonia to be a significant predictor of early resolution. Plateau pressure, social alcohol use and prophylactic heparin were significant predictors of non-early resolution. Backwards step-wise regression retained plateau pressure (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.24, p=0.001), social alcohol use (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.17-6.34, p=0.020), prophylactic heparin (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.46-7.21, p=0.004), aspiration pneumonia (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.62, p=0.006) and log (FiO2) (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.005-0.64, p=0.02) as independent significant predictors.
Conclusions: This study identified important clinical characteristics at the point of referral, in particular the aetiology of ARDS, that predict disease dynamics in ARDS patients receiving ECMO. These can help better prepare families, inform clinicians, plan resource utilization and guide future research into severe ARDS.
Date Issued
2021-01-01
Date Acceptance
2021-01-01
Citation
Critical Care Medicine, 2021, 49 (1), pp.135-135
ISSN
0090-3493
Publisher
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Start Page
135
End Page
135
Journal / Book Title
Critical Care Medicine
Volume
49
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2020 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000672597100262&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Source
50th Critical Care Congress
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
Publication Status
Published
Start Date
2021-01-31
Finish Date
2021-02-12
Coverage Spatial
Virtual event
Date Publish Online
2021-01-01