Venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) scoring in mechanically ventilated children: an evaluation of feasibility
File(s) Supplementary Manuscript.docx (37.81 KB) Revised Manuscript.pdf (734.28 KB)
Supporting information
Accepted version
Author(s)
Wadia, Toranj
Varghese Baby, MAnuel
Ghazaly, Marwa
Padmanabhan, Ramnarayan
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Congestion in ventilated, critically ill children may arise from disease pathology or from interventions (fluid resuscitation, positive-pressure ventilation, and vasoactive agents). We assessed the feasibility of applying adult VExUS scoring profiles (with and without IVC diameter) in this population and the inter-rater reliability of stored-image interpretation. Secondary objectives were to explore congestion patterns across diagnostic groups and variation with critical care interventions.
Methods: Children admitted to St Mary's Hospital PICU (4 February–7 April 2025) were scanned at 24 hours post-intubation, every 48 hours, and 24 hours post-extubation. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Diagnosis, interventions, and fluid balance were correlated with VExUS scores.
Results: VExUS profile D (excluding IVC diameter) was feasible in the greatest number of patients. Forty-nine scans from 22 patients (median age 15 months; 46% female) were included. Inter-rater reliability was high (κ=0.82, 95% CI 0.59–1.00). Median VExUS score
fell from 2 (IQR 1–3) post-intubation to 1 (IQR 1–1) post-extubation (V=41.5, p=0.023, r=0.84). Cumulative fluid balance at 24 hours differed significantly across VExUS grades (p=0.026, ε²=0.279): a score of 2 was associated with more negative percentage fluid balance
(–0.55%, IQR –2.41 to 0.47) than a score of 1 (1.30%, IQR 0.33–2.61; adjusted p=0.037).
Conclusion: VExUS profile D was the most feasible scoring approach in critically ill children, with good inter-rater reliability for stored-image interpretation, supporting remote mentorship where junior staff acquire images for expert review. The consistent fall in scores following
extubation suggests positive-pressure ventilation may confound scoring.
Methods: Children admitted to St Mary's Hospital PICU (4 February–7 April 2025) were scanned at 24 hours post-intubation, every 48 hours, and 24 hours post-extubation. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Diagnosis, interventions, and fluid balance were correlated with VExUS scores.
Results: VExUS profile D (excluding IVC diameter) was feasible in the greatest number of patients. Forty-nine scans from 22 patients (median age 15 months; 46% female) were included. Inter-rater reliability was high (κ=0.82, 95% CI 0.59–1.00). Median VExUS score
fell from 2 (IQR 1–3) post-intubation to 1 (IQR 1–1) post-extubation (V=41.5, p=0.023, r=0.84). Cumulative fluid balance at 24 hours differed significantly across VExUS grades (p=0.026, ε²=0.279): a score of 2 was associated with more negative percentage fluid balance
(–0.55%, IQR –2.41 to 0.47) than a score of 1 (1.30%, IQR 0.33–2.61; adjusted p=0.037).
Conclusion: VExUS profile D was the most feasible scoring approach in critically ill children, with good inter-rater reliability for stored-image interpretation, supporting remote mentorship where junior staff acquire images for expert review. The consistent fall in scores following
extubation suggests positive-pressure ventilation may confound scoring.
Date Acceptance
2026-07-18
Citation
The Ultrasound Journal
ISSN
2524-8987
Publisher
SpringerOpen
Journal / Book Title
The Ultrasound Journal
Copyright Statement
Copyright This paper is embargoed until publication. Once published the Version of Record (VoR) will be available on immediate open access.
License URL
Publication Status
Accepted
