Early-medium medium-term outcomes of primary focal cryotherapy to treat nonmetastatic clinically significant prostate cancer from a prospective multicentre registry
File(s)EURUROL-D-18-01107R4 copy.pdf (1.11 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Focal cryotherapy can be used to treat patients with clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer to reduce side effects.
Objective
Early-medium-term cancer control and functional outcomes.
Design, setting, and participants
A prospective registry-based case series of 122 consecutive patients undergoing focal cryotherapy between October 1, 2013, and November 30, 2016, in five UK centres. Median follow-up was 27.8 mo [interquartile range (IQR) 19.5–36.7]. A total of 35 patients (28.7%) had National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high risk and 87 (71.3%) had intermediate risk disease. Risk and zonal stratification included multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with targeted and systematic biopsies, or transperineal mapping biopsies.
Intervention
Focal cryoablation of MR-visible tumours.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis
Follow-up involved prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring, mpMRI, and for-cause biopsies. Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS), defined as transition to radical, whole-gland, or systemic therapy, or metastases/death. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and functional outcomes.
Results and limitations
A total of 80 (65.6%) had anterior ablation, 23 (19.7%) combined posterior and anterior ablation, and two (1.6%) posterior ablation alone (SeedNet or Visual-ICE, BTG plc). Median age was 68.7 yr (IQR 64.9–73.8) and preoperative PSA 10.8 ng/ml (IQR 7.8–15.6). Overall FFS at 3 yr was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 84.2–97.3]. When stratified for the NCCN risk group, 3-yr outcomes were 84.7% (95% CI 71.4–100) in high risk and 93.3% (95% CI 86.8–100) in intermediate risk. At last follow-up, incontinence defined as any pad use was 0/69 (0%) and erectile dysfunction (defined as erections insufficient for penetration) was 5/31 (16.1%). Limitations include lack of long-term outcomes.
Conclusions
Focal cryotherapy primarily for anterior intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer results in good rates of cancer control and low rates of treatment-related side effects.
Focal cryotherapy can be used to treat patients with clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer to reduce side effects.
Objective
Early-medium-term cancer control and functional outcomes.
Design, setting, and participants
A prospective registry-based case series of 122 consecutive patients undergoing focal cryotherapy between October 1, 2013, and November 30, 2016, in five UK centres. Median follow-up was 27.8 mo [interquartile range (IQR) 19.5–36.7]. A total of 35 patients (28.7%) had National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high risk and 87 (71.3%) had intermediate risk disease. Risk and zonal stratification included multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with targeted and systematic biopsies, or transperineal mapping biopsies.
Intervention
Focal cryoablation of MR-visible tumours.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis
Follow-up involved prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring, mpMRI, and for-cause biopsies. Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS), defined as transition to radical, whole-gland, or systemic therapy, or metastases/death. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and functional outcomes.
Results and limitations
A total of 80 (65.6%) had anterior ablation, 23 (19.7%) combined posterior and anterior ablation, and two (1.6%) posterior ablation alone (SeedNet or Visual-ICE, BTG plc). Median age was 68.7 yr (IQR 64.9–73.8) and preoperative PSA 10.8 ng/ml (IQR 7.8–15.6). Overall FFS at 3 yr was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 84.2–97.3]. When stratified for the NCCN risk group, 3-yr outcomes were 84.7% (95% CI 71.4–100) in high risk and 93.3% (95% CI 86.8–100) in intermediate risk. At last follow-up, incontinence defined as any pad use was 0/69 (0%) and erectile dysfunction (defined as erections insufficient for penetration) was 5/31 (16.1%). Limitations include lack of long-term outcomes.
Conclusions
Focal cryotherapy primarily for anterior intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer results in good rates of cancer control and low rates of treatment-related side effects.
Date Issued
2019-07-01
Date Acceptance
2018-12-18
Citation
European Urology, 2019, 76 (1), pp.98-105
ISSN
0302-2838
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
98
End Page
105
Journal / Book Title
European Urology
Volume
76
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sponsor
Wellcome Trust
University College London Hospitals Charity
Grant Number
204998/Z/16/Z
1348
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Urology & Nephrology
Clinically significant prostate cancer
Cryotherapy
Focal therapy
THERAPY
CONSENSUS
Clinically significant prostate cancer
Cryotherapy
Focal therapy
Urology & Nephrology
1103 Clinical Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2019-01-09