Associations between nursing faculty expertise in the united nations sustainable development goals and research impact metrics: a cross‐sectional study
Author(s)
Ruksakulpiwat, Suebsarn
Thongking, Witchuda
Niyomyart, Atsadaporn
Benjasirisan, Chitchanok
Phianhasin, Lalipat
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer a comprehensive global framework for promoting health, equity, and sustainability. Whereas alignment with the SDGs is increasingly encouraged in academic institutions, the extent to which faculty expertise in SDGs influences traditional research impact metrics remains insufficiently explored.
Objective
To investigate the relationship between nursing faculty expertise in SDGs and research impact metrics.
Methods
A retrospective cross-sectional design was employed using data from 121 nursing faculty members at Mahidol University, Thailand. Information on SDG-related expertise and research performance was obtained from the Mahidol University Research Excellence Database (MUREX) and Scopus. SDG expertise was operationalized using SDG alignment data derived from the Scopus Author Profile, which applies machine learning and keyword-based text mining to map publications to the 17 SDGs. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine associations between SDG expertise, academic experience, and research impact metrics, including H-index, citation count, and research output. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was applied as a complementary machine learning approach to identify influential features and potential nonlinear patterns, with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) used to address imbalance in categorical SDG expertise classes.
Results
Faculty members with greater expertise in SDGs demonstrated significantly higher research impact metrics. SDG expertise significantly predicted H-index (β = 0.65, p < 0.001), total citations (β = 31.78, p = 0.004), and total research output (β = 2.41, p < 0.001). Research experience was also a significant predictor of research impact. Machine learning analyses identified SDG expertise breadth and international collaboration as influential features, and faculty aligned with SDG13 (Climate Action) demonstrated a higher proportion of top-cited publications.
Conclusion
SDG expertise is a key determinant of academic impact, reinforcing the need for greater institutional support for SDG-aligned research. Interdisciplinary collaboration and engagement with broader sustainability challenges may enhance faculty research visibility. Future research should explore longitudinal trends and policy implications for integrating SDGs into faculty assessment frameworks.
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer a comprehensive global framework for promoting health, equity, and sustainability. Whereas alignment with the SDGs is increasingly encouraged in academic institutions, the extent to which faculty expertise in SDGs influences traditional research impact metrics remains insufficiently explored.
Objective
To investigate the relationship between nursing faculty expertise in SDGs and research impact metrics.
Methods
A retrospective cross-sectional design was employed using data from 121 nursing faculty members at Mahidol University, Thailand. Information on SDG-related expertise and research performance was obtained from the Mahidol University Research Excellence Database (MUREX) and Scopus. SDG expertise was operationalized using SDG alignment data derived from the Scopus Author Profile, which applies machine learning and keyword-based text mining to map publications to the 17 SDGs. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine associations between SDG expertise, academic experience, and research impact metrics, including H-index, citation count, and research output. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was applied as a complementary machine learning approach to identify influential features and potential nonlinear patterns, with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) used to address imbalance in categorical SDG expertise classes.
Results
Faculty members with greater expertise in SDGs demonstrated significantly higher research impact metrics. SDG expertise significantly predicted H-index (β = 0.65, p < 0.001), total citations (β = 31.78, p = 0.004), and total research output (β = 2.41, p < 0.001). Research experience was also a significant predictor of research impact. Machine learning analyses identified SDG expertise breadth and international collaboration as influential features, and faculty aligned with SDG13 (Climate Action) demonstrated a higher proportion of top-cited publications.
Conclusion
SDG expertise is a key determinant of academic impact, reinforcing the need for greater institutional support for SDG-aligned research. Interdisciplinary collaboration and engagement with broader sustainability challenges may enhance faculty research visibility. Future research should explore longitudinal trends and policy implications for integrating SDGs into faculty assessment frameworks.
Editor(s)
Leal Costa, César
Date Issued
2026-01-01
Date Acceptance
2026-03-05
Citation
Journal of Nursing Management, 2026, 2026 (1)
ISSN
0966-0429
Publisher
Wiley
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Nursing Management
Volume
2026
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2026 Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat et al. Journal of Nursing Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
9740644
Date Publish Online
2026-04-07