Group B Streptococcus vaccine development: present status and future considerations, with emphasis on perspectives for low and middle income countries
File(s)
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Globally, group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains the leading cause of sepsis and meningitis in young infants, with its greatest burden in the first 90 days of life. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for women at risk of transmitting GBS to their newborns has been effective in reducing, but not eliminating, the young infant GBS disease burden in many high income countries. However, identification of women at risk and administration of IAP is very difficult in many low and middle income country (LMIC) settings, and is not possible for home deliveries. Immunization of pregnant women with a GBS vaccine represents an alternate pathway to protecting newborns from GBS disease, through the transplacental antibody transfer to the fetus in utero. This approach to prevent GBS disease in young infants is currently under development, and is approaching late stage clinical evaluation.
This manuscript includes a review of the natural history of the disease, global disease burden estimates, diagnosis and existing control options in different settings, the biological rationale for a vaccine including previous supportive studies, analysis of current candidates in development, possible correlates of protection and current status of immunogenicity assays. Future potential vaccine development pathways to licensure and use in LMICs, trial design and implementation options are discussed, with the objective to provide a basis for reflection, rather than recommendations.
This manuscript includes a review of the natural history of the disease, global disease burden estimates, diagnosis and existing control options in different settings, the biological rationale for a vaccine including previous supportive studies, analysis of current candidates in development, possible correlates of protection and current status of immunogenicity assays. Future potential vaccine development pathways to licensure and use in LMICs, trial design and implementation options are discussed, with the objective to provide a basis for reflection, rather than recommendations.
Date Issued
2016-09-22
Date Acceptance
2016-09-01
Citation
F1000 Research, 2016, 5
ISSN
2046-1402
Publisher
F1000Research
Journal / Book Title
F1000 Research
Volume
5
Copyright Statement
© 2016 Kobayashi M et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sponsor
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Grant Number
BK 2014
n/a
Notes
referee-status: Indexed referee-response-16511: 10.5256/f1000research.10082.r16511, Laura Elizabeth Riley, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 10 Oct 2016, version 1, indexed referee-response-16507: 10.5256/f1000research.10082.r16507, Ronald Francis Lamont, Division of Surgery, Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research Campus, University College London, London, UK, 13 Oct 2016, version 1, indexed grant-information: Part of this work was supported by a grant to WHO from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Global Health Grant OPP1134011.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. copyright-info: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
2355