Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) complicated by heart failure (HF) have a poor prognosis. We investigated whether long-term loop-diuretic therapy in patients with AF and no known diagnosis of HF, as a potential surrogate marker of undiagnosed HF, is also associated with worse outcomes.
Methods: Adults with incident AF were identified from UK primary and secondary care records between 2004-2016. Repeat prescriptions for loop-diuretics, without a diagnosis of HF or documented non-cardiac indication, were classified as ‘isolated’ loop-diuretic use.
Results: Amongst 124,256 people with incident AF (median 76 years, 47% women), 22,001 (17.7%) had a diagnosis of HF, and 22,325 (18.0%) had isolated loop-diuretic use. During 2.9 (LQ-UQ 1-6) years’ follow-up, 12,182 patients were diagnosed with HF (incidence rate 3.2 [95%CI 3.1-3.3]/100 person-years). Of these, 3,999 (32.8%) had prior isolated loop-diuretic use, including 31% of patients diagnosed with HF following an emergency hospitalisation. The median time from AF to HF diagnosis was 3.6 (1.2-7.7) years in men versus 5.1 (1.8-9.9) years in women (p=0.0001). In adjusted models, patients with isolated loop-diuretic use had higher mortality (HR 1.42 [95%CI 1.37-1.47], p<0.0005) and risk of HF hospitalisation (HR 1.60 [95%CI 1.42-1.80], p<0.0005) than patients with no HF or loop-diuretic use, and comparably poor survival to patients with diagnosed HF
Conclusions: Loop-diuretics are commonly prescribed to patients with AF and may indicate increased cardiovascular risk. Targeted evaluation of these patients may allow earlier HF diagnosis, timely intervention and better outcomes, particularly amongst women with AF, in whom HF appears to be under-recognised and diagnosed later than in men.