Total ankle replacement design and positioning affect implant-bone micromotion and bone strains
File(s)1-s2.0-S1350453317300346-main.pdf (2.94 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Sopher, R
Amis, A
Calder, J
Jeffers, J
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Implant loosening
-
commonly linked with elevated initial
micromotion
-
is the primary indication for total ankle replacement (TAR)
revision. Finite element modelling (FEM) has not been used to assess
micromotion of TAR implants; additionally, the biomech
anical consequences
of TAR malpositioning
-
previously linked with higher failure rates
-
remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to estimate implant
-
bone
micromotion and peri
-
implant bone strains for optimally positioned and
malpositioned TAR prosthe
ses, and thereby identify fixation features and
malpositioning scenarios increasing the risk of loosening. Computational
models simulating three of the most commonly used TAR devices (BOX®,
Mobility® and Salto®) implanted into the tibia/talus and subjected
to
physiological loads were developed. Mobility and Salto demonstrated the
largest micromotion of all tibial and talar components, respectively. Any
malpositioning of the implant creating a gap between it and the bone
resulted in a considerable increase i
n micromotion and bone strains. It
was concluded that better primary stability can be achieved through
fixation nearer to the joint line and/or while relying on more than a
single peg. Incomplete seating on the bone may result in considerably
elevated impl
ant
-
bone micromotion and bone strains, thereby increasing
the risk for TAR failure.
-
commonly linked with elevated initial
micromotion
-
is the primary indication for total ankle replacement (TAR)
revision. Finite element modelling (FEM) has not been used to assess
micromotion of TAR implants; additionally, the biomech
anical consequences
of TAR malpositioning
-
previously linked with higher failure rates
-
remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to estimate implant
-
bone
micromotion and peri
-
implant bone strains for optimally positioned and
malpositioned TAR prosthe
ses, and thereby identify fixation features and
malpositioning scenarios increasing the risk of loosening. Computational
models simulating three of the most commonly used TAR devices (BOX®,
Mobility® and Salto®) implanted into the tibia/talus and subjected
to
physiological loads were developed. Mobility and Salto demonstrated the
largest micromotion of all tibial and talar components, respectively. Any
malpositioning of the implant creating a gap between it and the bone
resulted in a considerable increase i
n micromotion and bone strains. It
was concluded that better primary stability can be achieved through
fixation nearer to the joint line and/or while relying on more than a
single peg. Incomplete seating on the bone may result in considerably
elevated impl
ant
-
bone micromotion and bone strains, thereby increasing
the risk for TAR failure.
Date Issued
2017-02-21
Date Acceptance
2017-01-31
Citation
Medical Engineering & Physics, 2017, 42, pp.80-90
ISSN
1873-4030
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
80
End Page
90
Journal / Book Title
Medical Engineering & Physics
Volume
42
Copyright Statement
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IPEM. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Wellcome Trust
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant Number
N/A
088844/Z/09/Z
EP/K027549/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Engineering, Biomedical
Engineering
Total ankle replacement
Fixation
Micromotion
Malpositioning
Finite element modelling
FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS
TRABECULAR BONE
INTERFACE MICROMOTIONS
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
ANATOMIC SITE
ARTHROPLASTY
VALIDATION
MODEL
PREDICTION
Biomedical Engineering
02 Physical Sciences
09 Engineering
11 Medical And Health Sciences
Publication Status
Published