Screening criteria for enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs
Author(s)
Al-Hajri, Naser F.
Type
Thesis
Abstract
Oil production from EOR projects continues to supply an increasing
percentage of the world‟s oil. About 3% of the worldwide production now comes from
EOR [1]. To ensure the future supply of oil, more research needs to be done to
determine the optimal method of increasing the recovery from mature known field. In
this thesis we have developed screening criteria to maximize oil recovery using
different EOR strategies. Water flooding in heterogeneous and stratified oil
reservoirs often yields only low average oil recovery (around an average of 35%
globally). Recovery with conventional injection systems is imperfect due to the
incomplete sweep of the reservoir space. There are two factors affecting the
recovery one is the pore scale recovery, limited by interfacial tension and the other is
areal and vertical sweep efficiency limited by the heterogeneities, therefore it is
logical to try to improve this recovery . Oil recovery frequently involves the injection
of fluids into oil field reservoirs in an effort to drive the oil toward the production
wells. Various drive fluids including fresh water, re-injected oil field brines, polymer
solution, carbon dioxide, surfactant, flue gases and steam are used for this purpose.
Limited numbers of EOR methods have been used in this study based on the
properties of the reservoir and the screening criteria done from different studies.
While the mechanisms may differ significantly, these recovery methods have proven
to improve oil production in many reservoirs [2]. Reducing the mobility ratio between
water and oil, especially by increasing the viscosity of the injected water to reduce
and manage efficiently the water produced, is one of the most popular methods to
enhance the oil recovery. Significant water production is a serious problem in the
petroleum industry. While this problem can arise for several reasons, water
production from high permeability streaks or channels during water flooding
operations is a common cause. Excessive water production can not only reduce the
project economics by excessive water treatment and disposal cost but also can
completely prevent the production from gas and oil wells, from which the production
has become uneconomic.
The need for effective EOR technologies in the oil industry will become more
urgent in the future, as mature fields will be affected by pressure drop and water
production. Therefore, using some other alternative like polymer, solvent, and
surfactant injection will help to increase the production and reduce the water
production. Optimizing the recovery using different EOR technologies will help also
to decrease the water production in the system. This study was done based on
changes of the concentration of the injected agent and the slug size. Different
concentrations and slug sizes can improve the strategy used from a low recovery to
a very high one. The uncertainty of the oil price and geological heterogeneity (for
example permeability distribution) can also change the optimal choice of EOR
scheme and then the order of the preferred technology from one to another. A
sensitivity analysis was done to validate the outcome results and make sure that the
project is still profitable as the parameters changes on specific ranges.
percentage of the world‟s oil. About 3% of the worldwide production now comes from
EOR [1]. To ensure the future supply of oil, more research needs to be done to
determine the optimal method of increasing the recovery from mature known field. In
this thesis we have developed screening criteria to maximize oil recovery using
different EOR strategies. Water flooding in heterogeneous and stratified oil
reservoirs often yields only low average oil recovery (around an average of 35%
globally). Recovery with conventional injection systems is imperfect due to the
incomplete sweep of the reservoir space. There are two factors affecting the
recovery one is the pore scale recovery, limited by interfacial tension and the other is
areal and vertical sweep efficiency limited by the heterogeneities, therefore it is
logical to try to improve this recovery . Oil recovery frequently involves the injection
of fluids into oil field reservoirs in an effort to drive the oil toward the production
wells. Various drive fluids including fresh water, re-injected oil field brines, polymer
solution, carbon dioxide, surfactant, flue gases and steam are used for this purpose.
Limited numbers of EOR methods have been used in this study based on the
properties of the reservoir and the screening criteria done from different studies.
While the mechanisms may differ significantly, these recovery methods have proven
to improve oil production in many reservoirs [2]. Reducing the mobility ratio between
water and oil, especially by increasing the viscosity of the injected water to reduce
and manage efficiently the water produced, is one of the most popular methods to
enhance the oil recovery. Significant water production is a serious problem in the
petroleum industry. While this problem can arise for several reasons, water
production from high permeability streaks or channels during water flooding
operations is a common cause. Excessive water production can not only reduce the
project economics by excessive water treatment and disposal cost but also can
completely prevent the production from gas and oil wells, from which the production
has become uneconomic.
The need for effective EOR technologies in the oil industry will become more
urgent in the future, as mature fields will be affected by pressure drop and water
production. Therefore, using some other alternative like polymer, solvent, and
surfactant injection will help to increase the production and reduce the water
production. Optimizing the recovery using different EOR technologies will help also
to decrease the water production in the system. This study was done based on
changes of the concentration of the injected agent and the slug size. Different
concentrations and slug sizes can improve the strategy used from a low recovery to
a very high one. The uncertainty of the oil price and geological heterogeneity (for
example permeability distribution) can also change the optimal choice of EOR
scheme and then the order of the preferred technology from one to another. A
sensitivity analysis was done to validate the outcome results and make sure that the
project is still profitable as the parameters changes on specific ranges.
Date Issued
2010-05
Date Awarded
2010-07
Copyright Statement
Attribution NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-ND)
Advisor
King, Peter
Creator
Al-Hajri, Naser F.
Publisher Department
Earth Science and Engineering
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)