Evidence-based guidelines and decision support services: A discussion and evaluation in triple assessment of suspected breast cancer.
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Widespread health service goals to improve consistency and safety in patient care have prompted considerable investment in the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Computerised decision support (CDS) systems have been proposed as a means to implement guidelines in practice. This paper discusses the general concept in oncology and presents an evaluation of a CDS system to support triple assessment (TA) in breast cancer care. Balanced-block crossover experiment and questionnaire study. One stop clinic for symptomatic breast patients. Twenty-four practising breast clinicians from United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals. A web-based CDS system. Clinicians made significantly more deviations from guideline recommendations without decision support (60 out of 120 errors without CDS; 16 out of 120 errors with CDS, P < 0.001). Ignoring minor deviations, 16 potentially critical errors arose in the no-decision-support arm of the trial compared with just one (P = 0.001) when decision support was available. Opinions of participating clinicians towards the CDS tool became more positive after they had used it (P < 0.025). The use of decision support capabilities in TA may yield significant measurable benefits for quality and safety of patient care. This is an important option for improving compliance with evidence-based practice guidelines.
Date Issued
2006-12-04
Date Acceptance
2006-10-13
Citation
British journal of cancer, 2006, 95, pp.1490-6
ISSN
0007-0920
Start Page
1490
End Page
6
Journal / Book Title
British journal of cancer
Volume
95
Copyright Statement
© 2006 Cancer Research UK. From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Identifier
https://www.nature.com/articles/6603470
Subjects
Breast Neoplasms
Cross-Over Studies
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Breast Neoplasms
Cross-Over Studies
Evidence-Based Medicine
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted
Female
Practice Guidelines as Topic
1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Notes
file: :C$$:/Users/mw/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Patkar et al. - 2006 - Evidence-based guidelines and decision support services A discussion and evaluation in triple assessment of suspe.pdf:pdf keywords: Breast Neoplasms,Breast Neoplasms: diagnosis,Cross-Over Studies,Decision Making, Computer-Assisted,Evidence-Based Medicine,Evidence-Based Medicine: methods,Female,Humans,MDT,Practice Guidelines as Topic,argumentation,bjc,breast,cancer,proforma mendeley-tags: MDT,argumentation,bjc,breast,cancer,proforma pmid: 17117181
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
11
Date Publish Online
2006-11-21