Unsound foundations: refining AI’s role in audio-based COVID-19 detection
File(s)
Author(s)
Coppock, Harry
Type
Thesis
Abstract
This thesis explores the potential for respiratory audio biomarkers to enable detection of severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, with a focus on discerning the
true efficacy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) classifiers in this context. The research was motivated by
the early pandemic findings suggesting potential vocal biomarkers in COVID-19 infected individuals
and the subsequent surge in studies utilising Machine Learning (ML) methodologies for infection
detection.
Early results raised concerns about whether the success of the ML models was due to actual
respiratory audio biomarkers or to confounding signals in the audio recordings, such as recruitment
bias. To address these concerns, a large-scale study was undertaken as part of the UK government’s
pandemic response, leading to the collection of The UK COVID Vocal Audio Dataset, comprising
72,999 individuals, including 23,514 with positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2.
Unadjusted analysis of this dataset indicated high accuracy (Receiver Operating Characteristic
Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC)=0.846) of AI classifiers in predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection.
However, adjusting for measured confounders, such as self-reported symptoms, revealed significantly
weaker performance (ROC-AUC=0.619) with a further drop to random classification performance
when cases hypothesised to contain unmeasured confounders were removed. A key finding was that,
in practical settings, AI classifiers, while initially promising, were outperformed by predictions based
on user-reported symptoms.
The thesis concludes with the release of the collected dataset and offers best-practice
recommendations for future studies, particularly in the handling of recruitment bias and assessment
of audio-based classifiers’ utility in relevant practical contexts. This research provides valuable
insights into the capabilities and limitations of AI in medical diagnostics and across the wider field
of applications, emphasising the importance of careful study design and consideration of confounders in AI-enabled diagnostic tools.
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, with a focus on discerning the
true efficacy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) classifiers in this context. The research was motivated by
the early pandemic findings suggesting potential vocal biomarkers in COVID-19 infected individuals
and the subsequent surge in studies utilising Machine Learning (ML) methodologies for infection
detection.
Early results raised concerns about whether the success of the ML models was due to actual
respiratory audio biomarkers or to confounding signals in the audio recordings, such as recruitment
bias. To address these concerns, a large-scale study was undertaken as part of the UK government’s
pandemic response, leading to the collection of The UK COVID Vocal Audio Dataset, comprising
72,999 individuals, including 23,514 with positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2.
Unadjusted analysis of this dataset indicated high accuracy (Receiver Operating Characteristic
Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC)=0.846) of AI classifiers in predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection.
However, adjusting for measured confounders, such as self-reported symptoms, revealed significantly
weaker performance (ROC-AUC=0.619) with a further drop to random classification performance
when cases hypothesised to contain unmeasured confounders were removed. A key finding was that,
in practical settings, AI classifiers, while initially promising, were outperformed by predictions based
on user-reported symptoms.
The thesis concludes with the release of the collected dataset and offers best-practice
recommendations for future studies, particularly in the handling of recruitment bias and assessment
of audio-based classifiers’ utility in relevant practical contexts. This research provides valuable
insights into the capabilities and limitations of AI in medical diagnostics and across the wider field
of applications, emphasising the importance of careful study design and consideration of confounders in AI-enabled diagnostic tools.
Version
Open Access
Date Issued
2023-12
Date Awarded
2024-07
Copyright Statement
Creative Commons Attribution Licence
License URL
Advisor
Schuller, Bjorn
Sponsor
Teaching Scholarship
Publisher Department
Computing
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)