Chasing private information
File(s)ChasingAccepted.pdf (1.33 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Kacperczyk, Marcin T
Pagnotta, Emiliano
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Using over 5000 equity and option trades unequivocally based on nonpublic information about firm fundamentals, we find that commonly used asymmetric information proxies (AIPs) display abnormal values on days with informed trading. Volatility and trading volume are abnormally high, whereas illiquidity is low, both in equity and option markets. Daily returns reflect the sign of private signals but, on average, bid–ask spreads are 10% and 20% lower when informed investors are present in stock and option markets. Market makers’ learning under event uncertainty and the use of limit orders by informed investors help explain these findings. We characterize cross-sectional responses based on the duration of private information and find that informed traders select days with high uninformed volume to trade. Evidence from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Whistleblower Reward Program and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) involvement address potential selection concerns.
Date Issued
2019-12-01
Date Acceptance
2018-12-17
Citation
The Review of Financial Studies, 2019, 32 (12), pp.4997-5047
ISSN
0893-9454
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Start Page
4997
End Page
5047
Journal / Book Title
The Review of Financial Studies
Volume
32
Issue
12
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies.
All rights reserved. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in The Review of Financial Studies following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Marcin Kacperczyk, Emiliano S. Pagnotta, Chasing Private Information, The Review of Financial Studies, , hhz029, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz029
All rights reserved. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in The Review of Financial Studies following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Marcin Kacperczyk, Emiliano S. Pagnotta, Chasing Private Information, The Review of Financial Studies, , hhz029, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz029
Sponsor
Commission of the European Communities
Grant Number
PCIG14-GA-2013-631775
Subjects
Social Sciences
Business, Finance
Economics
Business & Economics
CROSS-SECTION
STOCK
INSIDER
PRICE
SECURITIES
ASYMMETRY
LIQUIDITY
MARKET
VOLUME
TIME
Finance
1401 Economic Theory
1402 Applied Economics
1502 Banking, Finance and Investment
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2019-03-08