Can there be a common, risk-based framework for decisions around live insect trade?
File(s)20-Quinlan-219-227.pdf (158.55 KB)
Published version
OA Location
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
A network of scientists involved in shipment of live insects has met and generated a series of articles on issues related
to live insect transport. The network is diverse, covering large-scale commercial interests, government operated areawide control programmes, biomedical research and many smaller applications, in research, education and private
uses. Many insect species have a record of safe transport, pose minimal risks and are shipped frequently between
countries. The routine shipments of the most frequently used insect model organism for biomedical research,
Drosophila melanogaster, is an example. Successful large-scale shipments from commercial biocontrol and pollinator
suppliers also demonstrate precedents for low-risk shipment categories, delivered in large volumes to high quality
standards. Decision makers need access to more information (publications or official papers) that details actual risks
from the insects themselves or their possible contaminants, and should propose proportionate levels of management.
There may be harm to source environments when insects are collected directly from the wild, and there may be harm
https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.41.1.3319
Scientific and Technical Review 41 (1) 2022 220
to receiving environments. Several risk frameworks include insects and various international coordinating bodies,
with experience of guidance on relevant risks, exist. All stakeholders would benefit from an integrated overview of
guidance for insect shipping, with reference to types of risk and categories of magnitude, without trying for a single
approach requiring universal agreement. Proposals for managing uncertainty and lack of data for smaller or infrequent shipments, for example, must not disrupt trade in large volumes of live insects, which are already supporting
strategic objectives in several sectors.
to live insect transport. The network is diverse, covering large-scale commercial interests, government operated areawide control programmes, biomedical research and many smaller applications, in research, education and private
uses. Many insect species have a record of safe transport, pose minimal risks and are shipped frequently between
countries. The routine shipments of the most frequently used insect model organism for biomedical research,
Drosophila melanogaster, is an example. Successful large-scale shipments from commercial biocontrol and pollinator
suppliers also demonstrate precedents for low-risk shipment categories, delivered in large volumes to high quality
standards. Decision makers need access to more information (publications or official papers) that details actual risks
from the insects themselves or their possible contaminants, and should propose proportionate levels of management.
There may be harm to source environments when insects are collected directly from the wild, and there may be harm
https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.41.1.3319
Scientific and Technical Review 41 (1) 2022 220
to receiving environments. Several risk frameworks include insects and various international coordinating bodies,
with experience of guidance on relevant risks, exist. All stakeholders would benefit from an integrated overview of
guidance for insect shipping, with reference to types of risk and categories of magnitude, without trying for a single
approach requiring universal agreement. Proposals for managing uncertainty and lack of data for smaller or infrequent shipments, for example, must not disrupt trade in large volumes of live insects, which are already supporting
strategic objectives in several sectors.
Date Issued
2022-05-01
Date Acceptance
2022-05-01
Citation
Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE, 2022, 41 (1), pp.219-227
ISSN
0253-1933
Publisher
O.I.E (World Organisation for Animal Health)
Start Page
219
End Page
227
Journal / Book Title
Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE
Volume
41
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2022 Quinlan M.M., Mumford J.D., Benedict M.Q., Wäckers F.,
Oliva C.F., Wohlfarter M., Smagghe G., Vila E., Klapwijk J., Michaelakis A.,
Collins C.M., Prudhomme J., Torres G., Diaz F., Saul-Gershenz L.,
Cook K., Verghese A. & Sreerama Kumar P.; licensee the World
Organisation for Animal Health. This is an open access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there
should not be any suggestion that WOAH or this article endorse any specific
organisation, product or service. The use of the WOAH logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
Oliva C.F., Wohlfarter M., Smagghe G., Vila E., Klapwijk J., Michaelakis A.,
Collins C.M., Prudhomme J., Torres G., Diaz F., Saul-Gershenz L.,
Cook K., Verghese A. & Sreerama Kumar P.; licensee the World
Organisation for Animal Health. This is an open access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there
should not be any suggestion that WOAH or this article endorse any specific
organisation, product or service. The use of the WOAH logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
Identifier
https://doc.woah.org/dyn/portal/index.xhtml?page=alo&aloId=42731
Subjects
0707 Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2022-05-01