Contrast agent free assessment of blood flow and wall shear stress in the rabbit aorta using ultrasound image velocimetry
File(s)1-s2.0-S0301562921004506-main.pdf (2.77 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Blood flow velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) influence and are influenced
by vascular disease. Their measurement is consequently useful in the laboratory and clinic. Contrast enhanced ultrasound image velocimetry (UIV) can
estimate them accurately but the need to inject contrast agents limits utility. Singular value decomposition and high frame rate imaging may render
contrast agents dispensable. Here we determined whether contrast agent free
UIV can measure flow and WSS. In simulation, accurate measurements were
achieved with a signal-to-noise ratio of 13.5 dB or higher. Signal intensity in
the rabbit aorta increased monotonically with mechanical index and was lowest during stagnant flow and uneven across the vessel. In vivo measurements
with contrast free and contrast enhanced UIV differed by 4.4 % and 1.9 % for
velocity magnitude and angle and by 9.47 % for WSS. Bland–Altman analysis of waveforms showed good agreement between contrast free and contrast enhanced UIV. In five rabbits the root-mean-square error was as low as 0.022
m/s (0.81 %) and 0.11 Pa (1.7 %). This study demonstrates that with an
optimised protocol, UIV can assess flow and WSS without contrast agents.
Unlike contrast enhanced UIV, it could be routinely employed.
by vascular disease. Their measurement is consequently useful in the laboratory and clinic. Contrast enhanced ultrasound image velocimetry (UIV) can
estimate them accurately but the need to inject contrast agents limits utility. Singular value decomposition and high frame rate imaging may render
contrast agents dispensable. Here we determined whether contrast agent free
UIV can measure flow and WSS. In simulation, accurate measurements were
achieved with a signal-to-noise ratio of 13.5 dB or higher. Signal intensity in
the rabbit aorta increased monotonically with mechanical index and was lowest during stagnant flow and uneven across the vessel. In vivo measurements
with contrast free and contrast enhanced UIV differed by 4.4 % and 1.9 % for
velocity magnitude and angle and by 9.47 % for WSS. Bland–Altman analysis of waveforms showed good agreement between contrast free and contrast enhanced UIV. In five rabbits the root-mean-square error was as low as 0.022
m/s (0.81 %) and 0.11 Pa (1.7 %). This study demonstrates that with an
optimised protocol, UIV can assess flow and WSS without contrast agents.
Unlike contrast enhanced UIV, it could be routinely employed.
Date Issued
2022-03
Date Acceptance
2021-10-10
Citation
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2022, 48 (3), pp.437-449
ISSN
0301-5629
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
437
End Page
449
Journal / Book Title
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume
48
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of World Federation for
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License URL
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562921004506?via%3Dihub
Subjects
Atherosclerosis
Blood flow
Blood speckle velocimetry
Echo-particle image velocimetry
Native blood speckle
Ultrasound image velocimetry
Vector flow imaging
Wall shear stress
1103 Clinical Sciences
Acoustics
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-12-05