DIET@NET: Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment in health research
File(s)
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Dietary assessment is complex, and strategies to select the most appropriate dietary assessment tool
(DAT) in epidemiological research are needed. The DIETary Assessment Tool NETwork (DIET@NET) aimed to establish
expert consensus on Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) for dietary assessment using self-report.
Methods: The BPGs were developed using the Delphi technique. Two Delphi rounds were conducted. A total of 131
experts were invited, and of these 65 accepted, with 48 completing Delphi round I and 51 completing Delphi round II.
In all, a total of 57 experts from North America, Europe, Asia and Australia commented on the 47 suggested guidelines.
Results: Forty-three guidelines were generated, grouped into the following four stages: Stage I. Define what is to be
measured in terms of dietary intake (what? who? and when?); Stage II. Investigate different types of DATs; Stage III.
Evaluate existing tools to select the most appropriate DAT by evaluating published validation studies; Stage IV. Think
through the implementation of the chosen DAT and consider sources of potential biases.
Conclusions: The Delphi technique consolidated expert views on best practice in assessing dietary intake. The BPGs
provide a valuable guide for health researchers to choose the most appropriate dietary assessment method for their
studies. These guidelines will be accessible through the Nutritools website, www.nutritools.org.
(DAT) in epidemiological research are needed. The DIETary Assessment Tool NETwork (DIET@NET) aimed to establish
expert consensus on Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) for dietary assessment using self-report.
Methods: The BPGs were developed using the Delphi technique. Two Delphi rounds were conducted. A total of 131
experts were invited, and of these 65 accepted, with 48 completing Delphi round I and 51 completing Delphi round II.
In all, a total of 57 experts from North America, Europe, Asia and Australia commented on the 47 suggested guidelines.
Results: Forty-three guidelines were generated, grouped into the following four stages: Stage I. Define what is to be
measured in terms of dietary intake (what? who? and when?); Stage II. Investigate different types of DATs; Stage III.
Evaluate existing tools to select the most appropriate DAT by evaluating published validation studies; Stage IV. Think
through the implementation of the chosen DAT and consider sources of potential biases.
Conclusions: The Delphi technique consolidated expert views on best practice in assessing dietary intake. The BPGs
provide a valuable guide for health researchers to choose the most appropriate dietary assessment method for their
studies. These guidelines will be accessible through the Nutritools website, www.nutritools.org.
Date Issued
2017-11-15
Date Acceptance
2017-10-19
Citation
BMC Medicine, 2017, 15
ISSN
1741-7015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Journal / Book Title
BMC Medicine
Volume
15
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
License URL
Sponsor
MRC
Grant Number
MR/L02019X/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
Dietary assessment methods
Guidelines
Nutritional epidemiology
Nutrition
Public health
FOOD PORTION SIZE
ENERGY-INTAKE
NUTRITIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
UNITED-KINGDOM
SELF-REPORT
VALIDITY
BIOMARKERS
VALIDATION
QUESTIONNAIRE
RECALL
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
202