Modulation of speech-in-noise comprehension through transcranial current stimulation with the phase-shifted speech envelope
File(s)08903231.pdf (1.07 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Reichenbach, Johann
Kadir, Shabnam
Kaza, Chrysoula
Weissbart, Hugo
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Neural activity tracks the envelope of a speech signal
at latencies from 50 ms to 300 ms. Modulating this neural tracking
through transcranial alternating current stimulation influences
speech comprehension. Two important variables that can affect
this modulation are the latency and the phase of the stimulation
with respect to the sound. While previous studies have found an
influence of both variables on speech comprehension, the
interaction between both has not yet been measured. We presented
17 subjects with speech in noise coupled with simultaneous
transcranial alternating current stimulation. The currents were
based on the envelope of the target speech but shifted by different
phases, as well as by two temporal delays of 100 ms and 250 ms.
We also employed various control stimulations, and assessed the
signal-to-noise ratio at which the subject understood half of the
speech. We found that, at both latencies, speech comprehension is
modulated by the phase of the current stimulation. However, the
form of the modulation differed between the two latencies. Phase
and latency of neurostimulation have accordingly distinct
influences on speech comprehension. The different effects at the
latencies of 100 ms and 250 ms hint at distinct neural processes for
speech processing.
at latencies from 50 ms to 300 ms. Modulating this neural tracking
through transcranial alternating current stimulation influences
speech comprehension. Two important variables that can affect
this modulation are the latency and the phase of the stimulation
with respect to the sound. While previous studies have found an
influence of both variables on speech comprehension, the
interaction between both has not yet been measured. We presented
17 subjects with speech in noise coupled with simultaneous
transcranial alternating current stimulation. The currents were
based on the envelope of the target speech but shifted by different
phases, as well as by two temporal delays of 100 ms and 250 ms.
We also employed various control stimulations, and assessed the
signal-to-noise ratio at which the subject understood half of the
speech. We found that, at both latencies, speech comprehension is
modulated by the phase of the current stimulation. However, the
form of the modulation differed between the two latencies. Phase
and latency of neurostimulation have accordingly distinct
influences on speech comprehension. The different effects at the
latencies of 100 ms and 250 ms hint at distinct neural processes for
speech processing.
Date Issued
2020-01
Date Acceptance
2019-09-03
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2020, 28 (1), pp.23-31
ISSN
1534-4320
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Start Page
23
End Page
31
Journal / Book Title
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume
28
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E
Wellcome Trust
National Institute for Health Research
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Identifier
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8903231
Grant Number
EP/M026728/1
108295/Z/15/Z
RDA26
EP/R032602/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Engineering, Biomedical
Rehabilitation
Engineering
Transcranial current stimulation
speech envelope
speech-in-noise comprehension
ALTERNATING-CURRENT STIMULATION
FALSE DISCOVERY RATE
CORTICAL ENTRAINMENT
BRAIN OSCILLATIONS
INTELLIGIBILITY
RESPONSES
Biomedical Engineering
0903 Biomedical Engineering
0906 Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2019-11-18