Improving the Quality of Ward-based Surgical Care With a Human Factors Intervention Bundle.
File(s)Table 1.docx (135.14 KB) Table 2.docx (94.76 KB)
Supporting information
Supporting information
Author(s)
Johnston, MJ
Arora, S
King, D
Darzi, A
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the impact of a human factors intervention bundle on the quality of ward-based surgical care in a UK hospital.
Summary of Background Data: Improving the culture of a surgical team is a difficult task. Engagement with stakeholders before intervention is key. Studies have shown that appropriate supervision can enhance surgical ward safety.
Methods: A pre-post intervention study was conducted. The intervention bundle consisted of twice-daily attending ward rounds, a "chief resident of the week" available at all times on the ward, an escalation of care protocol and team contact cards. Twenty-seven junior and senior surgeons completed validated questionnaires assessing supervision, escalation of care, and safety culture pre and post-intervention along with interviews to further explore the impact of the intervention. Patient outcomes pre and postintervention were also analyzed.
Results: Questionnaires revealed significant improvements in supervision postintervention (senior median pre 5 vs post 7, P = 0.002 and junior 4 vs 6, P = 0.039) and senior surgeon approachability (junior 5 vs 6, P = 0.047). Both groups agreed that they would feel safer as a patient in their hospital postintervention (senior 3 vs 4.5, P = 0.021 and junior 3 vs 4, P = 0.034). The interviews confirmed that the safety culture of the department had improved. There were no differences in inpatient mortality, cardiac arrest, reoperation, or readmission rates pre and postintervention.
Conclusion: Improving supervision and introducing clear protocols can improve safety culture on the surgical ward. Future work should evaluate the effect these measures have on patient outcomes in multiple institutions.
Summary of Background Data: Improving the culture of a surgical team is a difficult task. Engagement with stakeholders before intervention is key. Studies have shown that appropriate supervision can enhance surgical ward safety.
Methods: A pre-post intervention study was conducted. The intervention bundle consisted of twice-daily attending ward rounds, a "chief resident of the week" available at all times on the ward, an escalation of care protocol and team contact cards. Twenty-seven junior and senior surgeons completed validated questionnaires assessing supervision, escalation of care, and safety culture pre and post-intervention along with interviews to further explore the impact of the intervention. Patient outcomes pre and postintervention were also analyzed.
Results: Questionnaires revealed significant improvements in supervision postintervention (senior median pre 5 vs post 7, P = 0.002 and junior 4 vs 6, P = 0.039) and senior surgeon approachability (junior 5 vs 6, P = 0.047). Both groups agreed that they would feel safer as a patient in their hospital postintervention (senior 3 vs 4.5, P = 0.021 and junior 3 vs 4, P = 0.034). The interviews confirmed that the safety culture of the department had improved. There were no differences in inpatient mortality, cardiac arrest, reoperation, or readmission rates pre and postintervention.
Conclusion: Improving supervision and introducing clear protocols can improve safety culture on the surgical ward. Future work should evaluate the effect these measures have on patient outcomes in multiple institutions.
Date Issued
2016-11-30
Date Acceptance
2016-11-01
Citation
Annals of Surgery, 2016, 267 (1), pp.73-80
ISSN
0003-4932
Publisher
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Start Page
73
End Page
80
Journal / Book Title
Annals of Surgery
Volume
267
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Annals of Surgery. Publish Ahead of Print():, NOV 2016. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002089 and is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002089
Sponsor
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
National Institute for Health Research
Grant Number
N/A
NF-SI-0510-10186
Subjects
11 Medical And Health Sciences
Surgery
Publication Status
Published