Acceptability and feasibility of repeated mucosal specimen collection in clinical trial participants in Kenya
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Mucosal specimens are essential to evaluate compartmentalized immune responses to HIV vaccine candidates
and other mucosally targeted investigational products. We studied the acceptability and feasibility of repeated mucosal
sampling in East African clinical trial participants at low risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
Methods and Findings: The Kenya AIDS Vaccine Initiative (KAVI) enrolled participants into three Phase 1 trials of preventive
HIV candidate vaccines in 2011–2012 at two clinical research centers in Nairobi. After informed consent to a mucosal substudy,
participants were asked to undergo collection of mucosal secretions (saliva, oral fluids, semen, cervico-vaginal and
rectal), but could opt out of any collection at any visit. Specimens were collected at baseline and two additional time points.
A tolerability questionnaire was administered at the final sub-study visit. Of 105 trial participants, 27 of 34 women (79%) and
62 of 71 men (87%) enrolled in the mucosal sub-study. Nearly all sub-study participants gave saliva and oral fluids at all
visits. Semen was collected from about half the participating men (47–48%) at all visits. Cervico-vaginal secretions were
collected by Softcup from about two thirds of women (63%) at baseline, increasing to 78% at the following visits, with
similar numbers for cervical secretion collection by Merocel sponge; about half of women (52%) gave cervico-vaginal
samples at all visits. Rectal secretions were collected with Merocel sponge from about a quarter of both men and women
(24%) at all 3 visits, with 16% of men and 19% of women giving rectal samples at all visits.
Conclusions: Repeated mucosal sampling in clinical trial participants in Kenya is feasible, with a good proportion of
participants consenting to most sampling methods with the exception of rectal samples. Experienced staff members of
both sexes and trained counselors with standardized messaging may improve acceptance of rectal sampling.
and other mucosally targeted investigational products. We studied the acceptability and feasibility of repeated mucosal
sampling in East African clinical trial participants at low risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
Methods and Findings: The Kenya AIDS Vaccine Initiative (KAVI) enrolled participants into three Phase 1 trials of preventive
HIV candidate vaccines in 2011–2012 at two clinical research centers in Nairobi. After informed consent to a mucosal substudy,
participants were asked to undergo collection of mucosal secretions (saliva, oral fluids, semen, cervico-vaginal and
rectal), but could opt out of any collection at any visit. Specimens were collected at baseline and two additional time points.
A tolerability questionnaire was administered at the final sub-study visit. Of 105 trial participants, 27 of 34 women (79%) and
62 of 71 men (87%) enrolled in the mucosal sub-study. Nearly all sub-study participants gave saliva and oral fluids at all
visits. Semen was collected from about half the participating men (47–48%) at all visits. Cervico-vaginal secretions were
collected by Softcup from about two thirds of women (63%) at baseline, increasing to 78% at the following visits, with
similar numbers for cervical secretion collection by Merocel sponge; about half of women (52%) gave cervico-vaginal
samples at all visits. Rectal secretions were collected with Merocel sponge from about a quarter of both men and women
(24%) at all 3 visits, with 16% of men and 19% of women giving rectal samples at all visits.
Conclusions: Repeated mucosal sampling in clinical trial participants in Kenya is feasible, with a good proportion of
participants consenting to most sampling methods with the exception of rectal samples. Experienced staff members of
both sexes and trained counselors with standardized messaging may improve acceptance of rectal sampling.
Date Issued
2014-10-31
Date Acceptance
2014-09-09
Citation
PLOS One, 2014, 9 (10)
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Journal / Book Title
PLOS One
Volume
9
Issue
10
Copyright Statement
© 2014 Omosa-Manyonyi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
License URL
Article Number
e110228.