Bayesian analysis of cosmic ray propagation: evidence against homogeneous diffusion
File(s)apj_824_1_16.pdf (1.74 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
The American Astronomical Society, find out more
The American Astronomical Society, find out more
The Institute of Physics, find out more
The Institute of Physics, find out more
BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF COSMIC RAY PROPAGATION: EVIDENCE AGAINST HOMOGENEOUS DIFFUSION
G. Jóhannesson1, R. Ruiz de Austri2, A. C. Vincent3, I. V. Moskalenko4,5
, E. Orlando4,5, T. A. Porter4,5, A. W. Strong6, R. Trotta7,8
, F. Feroz9, P. Graff10,11Show full author list
Published 2016 June 3 • © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 824, Number 1 Citation G. Jóhannesson et al 2016 ApJ 824 16
Download Article PDF
Figures
Tables
References
Download PDF
1482 Total downloads
70
70 total citations on Dimensions.
Turn on MathJax
Get permission to re-use this article
Share this article
Share this content via email
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on Mendeley
Article information
Abstract
We present the results of the most complete scan of the parameter space for cosmic ray (CR) injection and propagation. We perform a Bayesian search of the main GALPROP parameters, using the MultiNest nested sampling algorithm, augmented by the BAMBI neural network machine-learning package. This is the first study to separate out low-mass isotopes (p, $\bar{p}$, and He) from the usual light elements (Be, B, C, N, and O). We find that the propagation parameters that best-fit $p,\bar{p}$, and He data are significantly different from those that fit light elements, including the B/C and 10Be/9Be secondary-to-primary ratios normally used to calibrate propagation parameters. This suggests that each set of species is probing a very different interstellar medium, and that the standard approach of calibrating propagation parameters using B/C can lead to incorrect results. We present posterior distributions and best-fit parameters for propagation of both sets of nuclei, as well as for the injection abundances of elements from H to Si. The input GALDEF files with these new parameters will be included in an upcoming public GALPROP update.
The American Astronomical Society, find out more
The Institute of Physics, find out more
The Institute of Physics, find out more
BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF COSMIC RAY PROPAGATION: EVIDENCE AGAINST HOMOGENEOUS DIFFUSION
G. Jóhannesson1, R. Ruiz de Austri2, A. C. Vincent3, I. V. Moskalenko4,5
, E. Orlando4,5, T. A. Porter4,5, A. W. Strong6, R. Trotta7,8
, F. Feroz9, P. Graff10,11Show full author list
Published 2016 June 3 • © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 824, Number 1 Citation G. Jóhannesson et al 2016 ApJ 824 16
Download Article PDF
Figures
Tables
References
Download PDF
1482 Total downloads
70
70 total citations on Dimensions.
Turn on MathJax
Get permission to re-use this article
Share this article
Share this content via email
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on Mendeley
Article information
Abstract
We present the results of the most complete scan of the parameter space for cosmic ray (CR) injection and propagation. We perform a Bayesian search of the main GALPROP parameters, using the MultiNest nested sampling algorithm, augmented by the BAMBI neural network machine-learning package. This is the first study to separate out low-mass isotopes (p, $\bar{p}$, and He) from the usual light elements (Be, B, C, N, and O). We find that the propagation parameters that best-fit $p,\bar{p}$, and He data are significantly different from those that fit light elements, including the B/C and 10Be/9Be secondary-to-primary ratios normally used to calibrate propagation parameters. This suggests that each set of species is probing a very different interstellar medium, and that the standard approach of calibrating propagation parameters using B/C can lead to incorrect results. We present posterior distributions and best-fit parameters for propagation of both sets of nuclei, as well as for the injection abundances of elements from H to Si. The input GALDEF files with these new parameters will be included in an upcoming public GALPROP update.
Date Issued
2016-06-03
Date Acceptance
2016-03-29
Citation
Astrophysical Journal, 2016, 824 (1)
ISSN
1538-4357
Publisher
American Astronomical Society
Journal / Book Title
Astrophysical Journal
Volume
824
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2016 The American Astronomical Society. The definitive publisher authenticated version is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/16.
Sponsor
Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
Science and Technology Facilities Council [2006-2012]
Science and Technology Facilities Council [2006-2012]
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
Grant Number
ST/K001051/1
ST/K001051/1
ST/K001051/1
ST-N000838
ST/N000838/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Astronomy & Astrophysics
astroparticle physics
cosmic rays
diffusion
Galaxy: general
ISM: general
methods: statistical
FERMI-LAT OBSERVATIONS
ENERGY-SPECTRA
ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION
SUPERNOVA-REMNANTS
SOLAR MODULATION
NUCLEI
SECONDARY
EMISSION
MODEL
CONSTRAINTS
astro-ph.HE
astro-ph.HE
astro-ph.GA
Astronomy & Astrophysics
0201 Astronomical and Space Sciences
0202 Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics
0306 Physical Chemistry (incl. Structural)
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 16
Date Publish Online
2016-06-03