The nature of organic records in impact excavated rocks on Mars
File(s)Supplementary Information.pdf (117.61 KB) Montgomery_Manuscript_ACCEPTED_SR.pdf (241.48 KB)
Supporting information
Accepted version
Author(s)
Montgomery, WB
Bromiley, GB
Sephton, MA
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Impact ejected rocks are targets for life detection missions to Mars. The
Martian subsurface is more favourable to organic preservation than the
surface owing to an attenuation of radiation and physical separation from
oxidising materials with increasing depth. Impact events bring materials to
the surface where they may be accessed without complicated drilling
procedures. On Earth, different assemblages of organic matter types are
derived from varying depositional environments. Here we assess whether
these different types of organic materials can survive impact events
without corruption. We subjected four terrestrial organic matter types to
elevated pressures and temperatures in piston-cylinder experiments
followed by chemical characterisation using whole-rock pyrolysis-gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry. Our data reveal that long chain
hydrocarbon-dominated organic matter (types I and II; mainly microbial or
algal) are unresistant to pressure whereas aromatic hydrocarbondominated
organic matter types (types III and IV; mainly land plant,
metamorphosed or degraded, displaying some superficial chemical
similarities to abiotic meteoritic organic matter) are relatively resistant.
This suggests that the impact excavated record of potential biology on
Mars will be unavoidably biased, with microbial organic matter
underrepresented while metamorphosed, degraded or abiotic meteoritic
organic matter types will be selectively preserved.
Martian subsurface is more favourable to organic preservation than the
surface owing to an attenuation of radiation and physical separation from
oxidising materials with increasing depth. Impact events bring materials to
the surface where they may be accessed without complicated drilling
procedures. On Earth, different assemblages of organic matter types are
derived from varying depositional environments. Here we assess whether
these different types of organic materials can survive impact events
without corruption. We subjected four terrestrial organic matter types to
elevated pressures and temperatures in piston-cylinder experiments
followed by chemical characterisation using whole-rock pyrolysis-gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry. Our data reveal that long chain
hydrocarbon-dominated organic matter (types I and II; mainly microbial or
algal) are unresistant to pressure whereas aromatic hydrocarbondominated
organic matter types (types III and IV; mainly land plant,
metamorphosed or degraded, displaying some superficial chemical
similarities to abiotic meteoritic organic matter) are relatively resistant.
This suggests that the impact excavated record of potential biology on
Mars will be unavoidably biased, with microbial organic matter
underrepresented while metamorphosed, degraded or abiotic meteoritic
organic matter types will be selectively preserved.
Date Issued
2016-08-05
Date Acceptance
2016-07-11
Citation
Scientific Reports, 2016, 6
ISSN
2045-2322
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
Scientific Reports
Volume
6
Copyright Statement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images
or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license,
unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license,
users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2016
or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license,
unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license,
users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© The Author(s) 2016
License URL
Sponsor
Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
Grant Number
ST/N000560/1
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
30947