Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic language person-centred climate questionnaire – staff version
Author(s)
Aljuaid, M
Elmontsri, M
Edvardsson, D
Rawaf, S
Majeed, A
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Aim
To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic language person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version.
Background
There have been increasing calls for a person‐centred rather than a disease‐centred approach to health care. A limited number of tools measure the extent to which care is delivered in a person‐centred manner, and none of these tools have been validated for us in Arab settings.
Method
The validated form of the person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version was translated into Arabic and distributed to 152 health care staff in teaching and non‐teaching hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Statistical estimates of validity and reliability were used for psychometric evaluation.
Results
Items on the Arabic form of the person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version had high reliability (Cronbach's alpha .98). Cronbach's alpha values for the three sub‐scales (safety, everydayness and community), were .96, .97 and .95 respectively. Internal consistency was also high and measures of validity were very good.
Conclusion
Arabic form of the person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version provides a valid and reliable way to measure the degree of perceived person‐centredness.
To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic language person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version.
Background
There have been increasing calls for a person‐centred rather than a disease‐centred approach to health care. A limited number of tools measure the extent to which care is delivered in a person‐centred manner, and none of these tools have been validated for us in Arab settings.
Method
The validated form of the person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version was translated into Arabic and distributed to 152 health care staff in teaching and non‐teaching hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Statistical estimates of validity and reliability were used for psychometric evaluation.
Results
Items on the Arabic form of the person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version had high reliability (Cronbach's alpha .98). Cronbach's alpha values for the three sub‐scales (safety, everydayness and community), were .96, .97 and .95 respectively. Internal consistency was also high and measures of validity were very good.
Conclusion
Arabic form of the person‐centred climate questionnaire—staff version provides a valid and reliable way to measure the degree of perceived person‐centredness.
Date Issued
2018-05-01
Date Acceptance
2017-08-27
Citation
Journal of Nursing Management, 2018, 26 (4), pp.449-456
ISSN
0966-0429
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
449
End Page
456
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Nursing Management
Volume
26
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the accepted version of the following article, which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jonm.12570
Subjects
Arabic version
Saudi Arabia
health care staff
person-centred care
psychometrics
questionnaires
1110 Nursing
Nursing
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2017-11-27