Shoulder implant alignment
File(s)
Author(s)
Bhuta, Asim
Type
Thesis
Abstract
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is used to treat patients with glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis.
Despite high success rates, complications occur and many patients undergo revision surgeries. The top
three most frequent complications are: instability/dislocation of the joint, glenoid loosening and rotator
cuff insufficiency. It is believed that these complications occur in most part due to alignment of the
implant.
In this thesis a two part investigation was conducted to test the effects of joint replacement humeral
head version (-15° to 15°) and tilt (-10° to 10°) and glenoid version and tilt (-15° to 15°). The first part
investigates the effect of the humeral head alignment on range of motion and activities of daily living
using a collision detection modelling method. The second part investigates the effect of both humeral
head and glenoid variations on the joint reaction and muscle forces to describe the risk of the three most
frequent complications using the United Kingdom National Shoulder Model.
This thesis shows that increasing humeral head posterior version decreased the ability to perform
activities of daily living (up to 32% at 15°) mostly due to bone-implant collision, increased the risk of
the rocking-horse mechanism (by up to 37% at 15°) and increased subscapularis activity (by up to 14%
at 15°). Similarly, increasing inferior tilt of the glenoid to 10° produced the best outcomes: vertical
rocking-horse mechanism decreased by 19% and no significant differences in muscle forces were
observed.
In conclusion, normal alignment of the humeral head following surgical guidelines is recommended to
increase the chances of implant survival. Posterior versions of the humeral head should be avoided
more so than other small mal-alignments. Increasing glenoid inferior tilt to 10° produced favourable
results but after combining the results from this thesis and from the literature, it is concluded that all
glenoid mal-alignments should be avoided and highlights the need for more effective surgical tools to
accurately position the shoulder replacement.
Despite high success rates, complications occur and many patients undergo revision surgeries. The top
three most frequent complications are: instability/dislocation of the joint, glenoid loosening and rotator
cuff insufficiency. It is believed that these complications occur in most part due to alignment of the
implant.
In this thesis a two part investigation was conducted to test the effects of joint replacement humeral
head version (-15° to 15°) and tilt (-10° to 10°) and glenoid version and tilt (-15° to 15°). The first part
investigates the effect of the humeral head alignment on range of motion and activities of daily living
using a collision detection modelling method. The second part investigates the effect of both humeral
head and glenoid variations on the joint reaction and muscle forces to describe the risk of the three most
frequent complications using the United Kingdom National Shoulder Model.
This thesis shows that increasing humeral head posterior version decreased the ability to perform
activities of daily living (up to 32% at 15°) mostly due to bone-implant collision, increased the risk of
the rocking-horse mechanism (by up to 37% at 15°) and increased subscapularis activity (by up to 14%
at 15°). Similarly, increasing inferior tilt of the glenoid to 10° produced the best outcomes: vertical
rocking-horse mechanism decreased by 19% and no significant differences in muscle forces were
observed.
In conclusion, normal alignment of the humeral head following surgical guidelines is recommended to
increase the chances of implant survival. Posterior versions of the humeral head should be avoided
more so than other small mal-alignments. Increasing glenoid inferior tilt to 10° produced favourable
results but after combining the results from this thesis and from the literature, it is concluded that all
glenoid mal-alignments should be avoided and highlights the need for more effective surgical tools to
accurately position the shoulder replacement.
Version
Open Access
Date Issued
2015-09
Date Awarded
2016-05
Copyright Statement
Attribution NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-ND)
Advisor
Bull, Anthony
Sponsor
Imperial College London
JRI Orthopaedics (Firm)
Publisher Department
Bioengineering
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)