Preconception counseling, predicting risk and outcomes in women with mWHO 3 and 4 heart disease
File(s)
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective
All women with CHD, especially those with more severe disease, should be offered preconception counseling (PCC), to discuss the risk of complications and to plan a future pregnancy. Several scoring system have been devised to estimate the risk of adverse events in pregnancies complicated by maternal heart disease (HD) and while comparisons have been made across the whole population, none have focused on the high-risk population.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study that included women classed as modified WHO (mWHO) 3 and 4 who had a pregnancy from at least 20 weeks gestation between 1994 and 2015 managed within our institution. We assessed how well the quoted risk (at PCC) of an adverse event (maternal or fetal) related to the actual rate of occurrence. We calculated NYHA and CARPREG scores for all patients, and the clinician assessment of percentage risk, to predict the occurrence of an adverse outcome.
Results
We identified 76 mWHO 3 and 4 women who had a total of 102 pregnancies. However, only in 63 pregnancies had the woman attended PCC. Both maternal and fetal adverse events were common. NYHA did not significantly predict any adverse events, whilst a CARPREG score of > 3 score predicted heart failure and mWHO4 score predicted maternal death. However, the best prediction of adverse outcomes was a composite quoted risk (percent) given at PCC.
Conclusions
Women must have access to PCC as those with worse CARPREG and mWHO scores encounter greater adverse events.
All women with CHD, especially those with more severe disease, should be offered preconception counseling (PCC), to discuss the risk of complications and to plan a future pregnancy. Several scoring system have been devised to estimate the risk of adverse events in pregnancies complicated by maternal heart disease (HD) and while comparisons have been made across the whole population, none have focused on the high-risk population.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study that included women classed as modified WHO (mWHO) 3 and 4 who had a pregnancy from at least 20 weeks gestation between 1994 and 2015 managed within our institution. We assessed how well the quoted risk (at PCC) of an adverse event (maternal or fetal) related to the actual rate of occurrence. We calculated NYHA and CARPREG scores for all patients, and the clinician assessment of percentage risk, to predict the occurrence of an adverse outcome.
Results
We identified 76 mWHO 3 and 4 women who had a total of 102 pregnancies. However, only in 63 pregnancies had the woman attended PCC. Both maternal and fetal adverse events were common. NYHA did not significantly predict any adverse events, whilst a CARPREG score of > 3 score predicted heart failure and mWHO4 score predicted maternal death. However, the best prediction of adverse outcomes was a composite quoted risk (percent) given at PCC.
Conclusions
Women must have access to PCC as those with worse CARPREG and mWHO scores encounter greater adverse events.
Date Issued
2017-05-01
Date Acceptance
2017-02-01
Citation
International Journal of Cardiology, 2017, 234, pp.76-80
ISSN
0167-5273
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
76
End Page
80
Journal / Book Title
International Journal of Cardiology
Volume
234
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000402473800013&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
mWHO3
mWHO4
Risk prediction
Preconception
Counseling
Pregnancy
EUROPEAN-SOCIETY
PREGNANCY
CONTRACEPTION
COMPLICATIONS
POPULATION
CARDIOLOGY
REGISTRY
CARE
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2017-02-04