Spectrum of practice in the routine management of cervical dystonia with abobotulinumtoxinA: findings from three prospective open-label observational studies
File(s)Spectrum of practice in the routine_BMC.pdf (559.78 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Misra, Vijay P
Trosch, Richard M
Maisonobe, Pascal
Om, Savary
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Cervical dystonia is a heterogeneous disorder with several possible presentations, for which first-line therapy is often botulinum toxin (BoNT). In routine clinical practice the success of each BoNT injection is dependent on several variables, including individual presentation and injection technique. Large multicenter, observational studies provide important information on individualized administration strategies that cannot be otherwise ascertained from controlled clinical trials. In this meta-analysis of patient level data, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with cervical dystonia undergoing routine treatment with botulinum toxin, specifically abobotulinumtoxinA. We also aimed to characterize current abobotulinumtoxinA injection techniques and parameters and to explore international differences in patient presentation and treatment. Methods: This was a meta-analysis of baseline data from three prospective, international, multicenter, observational studies (NCT01314365, NCT00833196 and NCT01753349) of botulinum toxin treatment for the routine management of adult cervical dystonia. Results: Data presented illustrate the significant heterogeneity of CD presentation in routine practice. Most subjects presented with a complex pattern of dystonic movements and the majority had additional components of shoulder elevation, tremor and/or jerk. Dosing was generally in accordance with that recommended in the abobotulinumtoxinA prescribing information, although the range of dosing also indicates that injections are tailored to individual presentation. Sub-group analyses at the country level revealed distinct differences in injection practice. Conclusions: This meta-analysis is based on the largest dataset of subjects with cervical dystonia studied to date. The heterogeneity revealed in our baseline findings support the need to develop consistent, practical and comprehensive best practice guidelines.
Date Issued
2018-07-09
Date Acceptance
2018-06-29
Citation
Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders, 2018, 5, pp.4-4
ISSN
2054-7072
Publisher
BMC
Start Page
4
End Page
4
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders
Volume
5
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s). 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link tothe Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002865
Subjects
Botulinum toxin
Cervical dystonia
Meta-analysis
Observational study
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
England
Article Number
ARTN 72