Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation, a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, is showing increasing promise as an adjunct
therapy in rehabilitation following stroke. However, although significant behavioural improvements have been reported in
proof-of-principle studies, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The rationale for transcranial direct current stimu-
lation as therapy for stroke is that therapeutic stimulation paradigms increase activity in ipsilesional motor cortical areas, but
this has not previously been directly tested for conventional electrode placements. This study was performed to test directly
whether increases in ipsilesional cortical activation with transcranial direct current stimulation are associated with behavioural
improvements in chronic stroke patients. Patients at least 6 months post-first stroke participated in a behavioural experiment
(
n
= 13) or a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment (
n
= 11), each investigating the effects of three stimulation
conditions in separate sessions: anodal stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere; cathodal stimulation to the contralesional
hemisphere; and sham stimulation. Anodal (facilitatory) stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere led to significant improve-
ments (5–10%) in response times with the affected hand in both experiments. This improvement was associated with an
increase in movement-related cortical activity in the stimulated primary motor cortex and functionally interconnected regions.
Cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation to the contralesional hemisphere led to a functional improvement only when compared with
sham stimulation. We show for the first time that the significant behavioural improvements produced by anodal stimulation
to the ipsilesional hemisphere are associated with a functionally relevant increase in activity within the ipsilesional primary
motor cortex in patients with a wide range of disabilities following stroke.
therapy in rehabilitation following stroke. However, although significant behavioural improvements have been reported in
proof-of-principle studies, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The rationale for transcranial direct current stimu-
lation as therapy for stroke is that therapeutic stimulation paradigms increase activity in ipsilesional motor cortical areas, but
this has not previously been directly tested for conventional electrode placements. This study was performed to test directly
whether increases in ipsilesional cortical activation with transcranial direct current stimulation are associated with behavioural
improvements in chronic stroke patients. Patients at least 6 months post-first stroke participated in a behavioural experiment
(
n
= 13) or a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment (
n
= 11), each investigating the effects of three stimulation
conditions in separate sessions: anodal stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere; cathodal stimulation to the contralesional
hemisphere; and sham stimulation. Anodal (facilitatory) stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere led to significant improve-
ments (5–10%) in response times with the affected hand in both experiments. This improvement was associated with an
increase in movement-related cortical activity in the stimulated primary motor cortex and functionally interconnected regions.
Cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation to the contralesional hemisphere led to a functional improvement only when compared with
sham stimulation. We show for the first time that the significant behavioural improvements produced by anodal stimulation
to the ipsilesional hemisphere are associated with a functionally relevant increase in activity within the ipsilesional primary
motor cortex in patients with a wide range of disabilities following stroke.
Date Issued
2011-12-06
Date Acceptance
2011-09-28
Citation
BRAIN, 2011, 135, pp.276-284
ISSN
0006-8950
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Start Page
276
End Page
284
Journal / Book Title
BRAIN
Volume
135
Copyright Statement
© 2011
The Author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.or
g/licenses/by-nc/3.0),
which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The Author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.or
g/licenses/by-nc/3.0),
which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000300044400032&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Clinical Neurology
Neurosciences
Neurosciences & Neurology
transcranial direct current stimulation
stroke rehabilitation
motor system
HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
BRAIN-STIMULATION
DC STIMULATION
RECOVERY
FMRI
REORGANIZATION
EXCITABILITY
IMPROVEMENT
MODULATION
HEMISPHERE
Publication Status
Published