The effect of implant position on bone strain following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical model using digital image correlation
File(s)2046-3758.68.bjr-2017-0067.r1.pdf (1.51 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Ali, AM
Newman, S
Hooper, P
Davies, C
Cobb, J
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objectives
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain.
Methods
A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system.
Results
A 5° increase in tibial component posterior slope resulted in a 53% increase in mean major principal strain in the posterior tibial zone adjacent to the implant (p = 0.003). The highest strains for all implant positions were recorded in the anterior cortex 2 cm to 3 cm distal to the implant. Posteriorly, strain tended to decrease with increasing distance from the implant. Lateral cortical strain showed no significant relationship with implant position.
Conclusion
Relatively small changes in implant position and orientation may significantly affect tibial cortical strain. Avoidance of excessive posterior tibial slope may be advisable during lateral UKA.
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain.
Methods
A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system.
Results
A 5° increase in tibial component posterior slope resulted in a 53% increase in mean major principal strain in the posterior tibial zone adjacent to the implant (p = 0.003). The highest strains for all implant positions were recorded in the anterior cortex 2 cm to 3 cm distal to the implant. Posteriorly, strain tended to decrease with increasing distance from the implant. Lateral cortical strain showed no significant relationship with implant position.
Conclusion
Relatively small changes in implant position and orientation may significantly affect tibial cortical strain. Avoidance of excessive posterior tibial slope may be advisable during lateral UKA.
Date Issued
2017-08-01
Date Acceptance
2017-06-27
Citation
Bone and Joint Research, 2017, 6 (8), pp.522-529
ISSN
2046-3758
Publisher
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
Start Page
522
End Page
529
Journal / Book Title
Bone and Joint Research
Volume
6
Issue
8
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Ali et al. this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-By-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Cell & Tissue Engineering
Orthopedics
Cell Biology
Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Digital image correlation
Bone strain
Tibial strain
Implant position
FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS
TIBIA MODELS
REPLACEMENT
SURFACE
FEMUR
LOAD
Bone strain
Digital image correlation
Implant position
Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Tibial strain
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2017-08-30