Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Faculty of Medicine
  4. Real-world presentation with heart failure in primary care: Do patients selected to follow diagnostic and management guidelines have better outcomes?
 
  • Details
Real-world presentation with heart failure in primary care: Do patients selected to follow diagnostic and management guidelines have better outcomes?
File(s)
e000935.full.pdf (562.79 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Bottle, Robert
Kim, Dani
Aylin, Paul
Majeed, Faroukh
Cowie, Martin
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective To describe associations between initial management of people presenting with heart failure (HF) symptoms in primary care, including compliance with the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and subsequent unplanned hospitalisation for HF and death.

Methods This is a retrospective cohort study using data from general practices submitting records to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The cohort comprised patients diagnosed with HF during 2010–2013 and presenting to their general practitioners with breathlessness, fatigue or ankle swelling.

Results 13 897 patients were included in the study. Within the first 6 months, only 7% had completed the NICE-recommended pathway; another 18.6% had followed part of it (B-type natriuretic peptide testing and/or echocardiography, or specialist referral). Significant differences in hazards were seen in unadjusted analysis in favour of full or partial completion of the NICE-recommended pathway. Covariate adjustment attenuated the relations with death much more than those for HF admission. Compared with patients placed on the NICE pathway, treatment with HF medications had an HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.28, p=0.003) for HF admission and 1.03 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.17, p= 0.674) for death. Patients who partially followed the NICE pathway had similar hazards to those who completed it. Patients on no pathway had the highest hazard for HF admission at 1.30 (95% 1.18 to 1.43, p<0.001) but similar hazard for death.

Conclusions Patients not put on at least some elements of the NICE-recommended pathway had significantly higher risk of HF admission but non-significant higher risk of death than other patients had.
Date Issued
2018-11-10
Date Acceptance
2018-10-17
Citation
Open Heart, 2018, 5
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/65624
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000935
ISSN
2053-3624
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
Open Heart
Volume
5
Copyright Statement
© 2018 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Sponsor
National Institute for Health Research
Dr Foster Intelligence
Grant Number
n/a
WPPA_P72388
Subjects
clinical practice research datalink
electronic medical records
heart failure
nice guidelines
primary care
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
e000935
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback