Enhancing assessment of in-situ beam-column strength through probing and machine learning
File(s)fbuil-1-1492235.pdf (16.7 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Ma, Jin Terng
Lapira, Luke
Wadee, MA
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Beam-columns are designed to withstand the concurrent action of both axial and bending
stresses. Therefore, when assessing the structural health of an in-situ beam-column, both
of these load effects must be considered. Probing, having been shown recently to be an
effective methodology for predicting the in-situ health of prestressed-stayed columns under
axial compression, is applied presently for predicting the in-situ health of beam-columns. While
the probing stiffness was sufficient for predicting the health of prestressed stayed columns,
additional data is required to predict both the moment and the axial utilisation ratios. It is shown
that the initial lateral deflection is a suitable measure considered alongside the probing stiffness
measured at various probing locations within a revised Machine Learning (ML) framework. The
inclusion of both terms in the ML framework is shown to produce an almost exact prediction of
both the aforementioned utilisation ratios for various design combinations, thereby demonstrating
that the probing framework proposed herein is an appropriate methodology for evaluating the
structural strength reserves of beam-columns.
stresses. Therefore, when assessing the structural health of an in-situ beam-column, both
of these load effects must be considered. Probing, having been shown recently to be an
effective methodology for predicting the in-situ health of prestressed-stayed columns under
axial compression, is applied presently for predicting the in-situ health of beam-columns. While
the probing stiffness was sufficient for predicting the health of prestressed stayed columns,
additional data is required to predict both the moment and the axial utilisation ratios. It is shown
that the initial lateral deflection is a suitable measure considered alongside the probing stiffness
measured at various probing locations within a revised Machine Learning (ML) framework. The
inclusion of both terms in the ML framework is shown to produce an almost exact prediction of
both the aforementioned utilisation ratios for various design combinations, thereby demonstrating
that the probing framework proposed herein is an appropriate methodology for evaluating the
structural strength reserves of beam-columns.
Date Issued
2024-12-11
Date Acceptance
2024-11-18
Citation
Frontiers in Built Environment, 2024, 10
ISSN
2297-3362
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Journal / Book Title
Frontiers in Built Environment
Volume
10
Copyright Statement
© 2024 Ma, Lapira and Wadee. This is an
open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (CC BY). The use, distribution or
reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) and the
copyright owner(s) are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in
accordance with accepted academic practice.
No use, distribution or reproduction is
permitted which does not comply with
these terms
open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (CC BY). The use, distribution or
reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) and the
copyright owner(s) are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in
accordance with accepted academic practice.
No use, distribution or reproduction is
permitted which does not comply with
these terms
License URL
Identifier
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/built-environment/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1492235/full
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
1492235
Date Publish Online
2024-12-11