Economic impact case study of a wearable medical device for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea
File(s)Economic Impact Case Study v3 untracked.docx (185.79 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Setters, Jo
Paynter, Jonathan
Hanlon, Jo
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
AcuPebble SA100 (‘AcuPebble’) is a novel wearable medical device to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). This paper investigates the potential economic impact of the technology in the UK through cost savings analysis, and the redirection of savings into further diagnoses.
Methods
A cost comparison study was conducted, comparing AcuPebble to the standard diagnostic approach of home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) and in-clinic polysomnography (PSG), estimating the net benefit value (NBV) and return on investment (ROI). Cohort size was varied to model the effects of volume discounted pricing and staff training costs. To demonstrate the potential for cost savings, data on the healthcare costs of undiagnosed OSA patients were used to quantify the benefit of increased OSA diagnosis rates, as facilitated by AcuPebble.
Results
For 500 uses of AcuPebble, the NBV in the diagnostic pathway over one year would be in excess of £101,169, increasing to £341,665 for 1,500 uses, £1,263,993 for 5,000 uses, and to £2,628,198 for 10,000 uses, with ROIs of 2.02, 3.03, 5.05, and 6.56, respectively. Given an initial cohort of 1,500 patients, 4,555 extra AcuPebble studies could be completed by redirecting resources from HRP/PSG. Direct cost savings to the NHS from resultant lower undiagnosed rates could be between £24,147 and £4,707,810, based on the cost per use and the percentage of tests that result in a positive diagnosis (varied from 25% to 75% positives).
Conclusions
AcuPebble presents an opportunity for substantial healthcare savings, enabling an increase in the number of people tested, diagnosed and treated for OSA.
AcuPebble SA100 (‘AcuPebble’) is a novel wearable medical device to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). This paper investigates the potential economic impact of the technology in the UK through cost savings analysis, and the redirection of savings into further diagnoses.
Methods
A cost comparison study was conducted, comparing AcuPebble to the standard diagnostic approach of home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) and in-clinic polysomnography (PSG), estimating the net benefit value (NBV) and return on investment (ROI). Cohort size was varied to model the effects of volume discounted pricing and staff training costs. To demonstrate the potential for cost savings, data on the healthcare costs of undiagnosed OSA patients were used to quantify the benefit of increased OSA diagnosis rates, as facilitated by AcuPebble.
Results
For 500 uses of AcuPebble, the NBV in the diagnostic pathway over one year would be in excess of £101,169, increasing to £341,665 for 1,500 uses, £1,263,993 for 5,000 uses, and to £2,628,198 for 10,000 uses, with ROIs of 2.02, 3.03, 5.05, and 6.56, respectively. Given an initial cohort of 1,500 patients, 4,555 extra AcuPebble studies could be completed by redirecting resources from HRP/PSG. Direct cost savings to the NHS from resultant lower undiagnosed rates could be between £24,147 and £4,707,810, based on the cost per use and the percentage of tests that result in a positive diagnosis (varied from 25% to 75% positives).
Conclusions
AcuPebble presents an opportunity for substantial healthcare savings, enabling an increase in the number of people tested, diagnosed and treated for OSA.
Editor(s)
Paynter, Jonathan
Date Acceptance
2024-10-04
Citation
BMC Health Services Research
ISSN
1472-6963
Publisher
BMC
Journal / Book Title
BMC Health Services Research
Copyright Statement
Subject to copyright. This paper is embargoed until publication. Once published the Version of Record (VoR) will be available on immediate open access.
License URL
Publication Status
Accepted
Rights Embargo Date
10000-01-01