Variation in social media sensitivity across people and contexts
File(s)s41598-024-55064-y.pdf (2.8 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Social media impacts people’s wellbeing in diferent ways, but relatively little is known about
why this is the case. Here we introduce the construct of “social media sensitivity” to understand
how social media and wellbeing associations difer across people and the contexts in which these
platforms are used. In a month-long large-scale intensive longitudinal study (total n= 1632; total
number of observations = 120,599), we examined for whom and under which circumstances social
media was associated with positive and negative changes in social and afective wellbeing. Applying
a combination of frequentist and Bayesian multilevel models, we found a small negative average
association between social media use AND subsequent wellbeing, but the associations were
heterogenous across people. People with psychologically vulnerable dispositions (e.g., those who
were depressed, lonely, not satisfed with life) tended to experience heightened negative social media
sensitivity in comparison to people who were not psychologically vulnerable. People also experienced
heightened negative social media sensitivity when in certain types of places (e.g., in social places,
in nature) and while around certain types of people (e.g., around family members, close ties), as
compared to using social media in other contexts. Our results suggest that an understanding of the
efects of social media on wellbeing should account for the psychological dispositions of social media
users, and the physical and social contexts surrounding their use. We discuss theoretical and practical
implications of social media sensitivity for scholars, policymakers, and those in the technology
industry.
why this is the case. Here we introduce the construct of “social media sensitivity” to understand
how social media and wellbeing associations difer across people and the contexts in which these
platforms are used. In a month-long large-scale intensive longitudinal study (total n= 1632; total
number of observations = 120,599), we examined for whom and under which circumstances social
media was associated with positive and negative changes in social and afective wellbeing. Applying
a combination of frequentist and Bayesian multilevel models, we found a small negative average
association between social media use AND subsequent wellbeing, but the associations were
heterogenous across people. People with psychologically vulnerable dispositions (e.g., those who
were depressed, lonely, not satisfed with life) tended to experience heightened negative social media
sensitivity in comparison to people who were not psychologically vulnerable. People also experienced
heightened negative social media sensitivity when in certain types of places (e.g., in social places,
in nature) and while around certain types of people (e.g., around family members, close ties), as
compared to using social media in other contexts. Our results suggest that an understanding of the
efects of social media on wellbeing should account for the psychological dispositions of social media
users, and the physical and social contexts surrounding their use. We discuss theoretical and practical
implications of social media sensitivity for scholars, policymakers, and those in the technology
industry.
Date Issued
2024-03-19
Date Acceptance
2024-02-20
Citation
Scientific Reports, 2024, 14
ISSN
2045-2322
Publisher
Nature Portfolio
Journal / Book Title
Scientific Reports
Volume
14
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
License URL
Identifier
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-55064-y#Abs1
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
6571
Date Publish Online
2024-03-19